search for: 000006c0

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "000006c0".

2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...> 000052c0 l F .text 000001e2 record_alias_subset > -0000064f l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20708 > -00000663 l O .rodata 0000000e __FUNCTION__.20299 > -000006a0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.20223 > -00000671 l O .rodata 00000019 __FUNCTION__.20731 > -000006c0 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.20111 > -000006d8 l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.22492 > -000006e8 l O .rodata 00000016 __FUNCTION__.22568 > +0000064f l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20622 > +00000663 l O .rodata 0000000e __FUNCTION__.20214 > +000006a0 l...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the