Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "000006a0".
Did you mean:
000006aa
2008 Nov 12
0
libxen-dev: multiple symbol definition
...OTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND unlock_pages
15: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND lock_pages
17: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND unlock_pages
9: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND lock_pages
11: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND unlock_pages
54: 000006a0 86 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 unlock_pages
56: 00000700 41 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1 lock_pages
8: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND lock_pages
10: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND unlock_pages
8: 00000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND lock_pages...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...TION__.22543
> +00000622 l O .rodata 0000001e __FUNCTION__.19955
> 00000640 l O .rodata 0000000f .str9
> 000052c0 l F .text 000001e2 record_alias_subset
> -0000064f l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20708
> -00000663 l O .rodata 0000000e __FUNCTION__.20299
> -000006a0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.20223
> -00000671 l O .rodata 00000019 __FUNCTION__.20731
> -000006c0 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.20111
> -000006d8 l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.22492
> -000006e8 l O .rodata 00000016 __FUNCTION__.22568
> +0000064f l...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the