Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "000005b0".
Did you mean:
00000570
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...ned_p
> 00003a20 l F .text ffffc7f8 nonlocal_referenced_p_1
> -00000598 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.22833
> +00000598 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.22744
> 00003c00 l F .text 0000009a nonlocal_set_p
> 00003ca0 l F .text ffffc5a4 nonlocal_set_p_1
> -000005b0 l O .rodata 00000011 __FUNCTION__.22936
> +000005b0 l O .rodata 00000011 __FUNCTION__.22845
> 00000020 l O .bss 000000d4 static_reg_base_value
> 0000010c l O .bss 00000001 memory_modified.b
> 00003f00 l F .text 0000005b memory_modified_1
> 0000000c l O .bs...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the