search for: 000004bf

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "000004bf".

Did you mean: 000004b2
2004 Apr 16
1
tor2 driver panics with 2 sticks of memory
...rh_int_timer_do [usb-ohci] 0x0 Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: CPU 0:f6a2bea4 c023f901 00000000 00000001 fffffff f 00000000 c010a362 c023f916 Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: 00000000 f79ce6a4 f6a2bef8 c017f574 000004 00 00000005 000004bf 00008a31 Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: 7f1c0300 01000415 1a131100 170f1200 000000 00 f6a2a000 f782d978 f782d978 Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: Call Trace: [<c010a362>] __global_cli [kernel] 0x e2 Apr 16 14:42:47 test71 kernel: [<c017f574>] change_termios [kernel] 0x24 Apr 16...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...022 __FUNCTION__.21766 > +00000480 l O .rodata 00000022 __FUNCTION__.21679 > 000004a2 l O .rodata 0000000d .str4 > 000004af l O .rodata 00000010 .str5 > 00002710 l F .text 00000012 aliases_everything_p > 00002730 l F .text 000000a3 decl_for_component_ref > -000004bf l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.21932 > +000004bf l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.21845 > 000027e0 l F .text 000001fa adjust_offset_for_component_ref > -000004e0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.21966 > +000004e0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.21879 > 00...
2020 Jul 01
2
13.22.0 - HTTP session count exceeded 100 sessions - instance unusable
...the CLI but no command is executed, you also cannot get the Asterisk to stop with HUP / kill -1 and I have to kill -9 the Asterisk PID at the end of the day. I'm also, just prior the above taking place, getting tens of thousands of these warnings in the CLI: [Jul 1 14:30:39] WARNING[16819][C-000004bf]: taskprocessor.c:895 taskprocessor_push: The 'stasis-core-control' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. I'm using AMI at several hundred lines of traffic per second to control the Asterisk instance, spawn new calls, get queue and agent statuses, etc. - standard AMI...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the