Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "000003c7".
Did you mean:
00000317
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...32-i386
> -stage2/alias.o
> +alias.o: file format elf32-i386
> +alias.o
> architecture: i386, flags 0x00000011:
> HAS_RELOC, HAS_SYMS
> start address 0x00000000
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> 00000000 l d .bss 00000000
> 00000010 l O .bss 00000004 alias_sets
> 000003c7 l O .rodata 0000003a .str
> -000005fb l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20030
> +000005fb l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.19945
> 00000000 l d .rodata 00000000
> 000003f0 l F .text 0000005e gt_ggc_ma_reg_known_value
> 00000014 l O .bss 00000004 reg_known_...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the