Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "000003b8".
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...text 0000005e gt_ggc_ma_reg_known_value
> 00000014 l O .bss 00000004 reg_known_value
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> 00004e00 l F .text 00000090 gt_pch_pa_alias_invariant
> 00000590 l F .text 00000026 insert_subset_children
> 000005e0 l F .text 00000216 find_base_decl
> -000003b8 l O .rodata 0000000f __FUNCTION__.20147
> +000003b8 l O .rodata 0000000f __FUNCTION__.20062
> 00000000 l O .bss 00000004 last_alias_set
> 00000401 l O .rodata 0000000b .str1
> 00000000 l O .data 00000004 frame_set
> @@ -45,67 +45,67 @@
> 000000f8 l O .b...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the