Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "000000fc".
Did you mean:
000000ff
2010 Oct 02
2
Attempts to hack Asterisk - What do these lines means
...someone please explain what is happening or what the hacker is trying to
reach:
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-000000fb sip "sip" <sip> s ANSWERED 13
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-000000fe sip "sip" <sip> s ANSWERED 13
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-000000fc sip "sip" <sip> s ANSWERED 13
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-000000fd sip "sip" <sip> s ANSWERED 13
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-000000ff sip "sip" <sip> s ANSWERED 13
02/10/2010 11:10 SIP/113.105.152.51-00000100 sip "sip" <si...
2007 Apr 03
2
ssl connections frozen, client times out
Hi there,
I'm using the latest Thunderbird & Dovecot. I'm trying to setup either
pop3s or imaps. The plain versions of the protocols both work fine for
me, even with the TLS option selected in Thunderbird. But when I try to
use the ssl versions, my client does not negotiate - it just time's out.
I have as much logging enabled as possible and the only thing that shows
up
2009 Apr 10
1
Stronghold 2 Problems
Has anyone managed to get Stronghold 2 working with wine post 1.0? I'm sure I've managed to play it before on earlier versions of wine but I have tried with version 1.01 and 1.1.18 but can't play it.
Using versions 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 of Stronghold 2, the game crashes after a few seconds of game play.
Using versions 1.3.1, 1.4 and 1.4.1 I can't run the game without installing
2010 Jul 29
1
Re: Lands of Lore 3 is crashing in direct3D mode
...fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33ece4,0x00000000), stub!
fixme:d3d:swapchain_init Add OpenGL context recreation support to context_validate_onscreen_formats
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x000000fc at address 0xfc (thread 0019), starting debugger...
Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x000000fc in 32-bit code (0x000000fc).
Register dump:...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
....20147
> +000003b8 l O .rodata 0000000f __FUNCTION__.20062
> 00000000 l O .bss 00000004 last_alias_set
> 00000401 l O .rodata 0000000b .str1
> 00000000 l O .data 00000004 frame_set
> @@ -45,67 +45,67 @@
> 000000f8 l O .bss 00000001 copying_arguments.b
> 000000fc l O .bss 00000004 new_reg_base_value
> 000000f4 l O .bss 00000004 reg_base_value
> -0000040c l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.20810
> +0000040c l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.20724
> 00000c60 l F .text 0000032e record_set
> 00000100 l O .bss 00000004 re...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the