Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "000000c6".
Did you mean:
000000c0
2009 Jan 28
2
7.1 new install halts on BTX error
...00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
ss:eip=2b 00 00 00 33 00 00 00-00 0c 04 00 5f ad 08 04
00 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 24 1c 06 00
BTX halted
If I break to the loader prompt and try 'ls /boot', I get this backtrace:
int=00000006 err=00000000 efl=00010203 eip=00040c08
eax=000000c6 ebx=00000008 ecx=eb000000 edx=000000c6
esi=00000004 edi=000000c2 ebp=00000000 esp=0008f8b4
cs=002b ds=0033 es=002b fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033
cs:eip=8f 49 40 00 94 49 00 cb-00 00 04 00 00 00 fc 07
80 00 00 00 04 00 00 00-94 49 00 00 00 00 00 00
ss:eip=00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00...
2004 Aug 06
1
New icecast2 win32 binary...
I've updated the win32 icecast2 binary on my site to reflect current CVS
(as of now - March 19, 2003)....
It's available here for anyone interested :
http://www.oddsock.org/tools/icecast2/
<p>oddsock
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2011 Jun 21
1
: Re: ITSP failover for PRI
...39;XXXXXX' on channel 0/22, span 1 Executing
[XXXXXX at outgoing:1] NoOp("DAHDI/22-1", """ <XXXXXX>") in new stack Executing
[XXXXXX at outgoing:2] Dial("DAHDI/22-1", "SIP/XXXXXX at ITSP1") in new stack
Called XXXXXX at ITSP1
SIP/ITSP1-000000c6 is circuit-busy (This result is because the ITSP1
account is blocked for testing)
Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0)
ITSP2:
Executing [XXXXXX at outgoing:3] Dial("DAHDI/22-1", "SIP/XXXXXX at ITSP2") in new
stack Called XXXXXX at ITSP2...
2008 Jun 26
5
Can not run DVDSubEdit (Help!)
...0000003f -1
00000056 -1
00000054 -1
000000b2 -1
0000003c -1
00000093 -1
00000029 -1
00000098 -1
00000076 -1
000000c9 -1
00000092 -1
00000036 -1
0000001c -1
000000de -1
000000c4 -1
0000009b -1
000000cd -1
0000009a -1
000000da -1
0000008e -1
000000c6 -1
00000025 -1
000000d6 -1
00000064 -1
00000072 -1
000000d3 -1
00000094 -1
00000062 -1
00000052 -1
00000055 -1
00000073 -1
00000059 -1
00000024 -1
0000000b -1
0000001a -1
000000c0 -1
0000006f -1
00000057 -1
00000015 -1
000000a8 -1
00000058...
2017 Jun 06
2
[newbie] trouble with global variables and CreateLoad/Store in JIT
...EL_I386_REL32 _setGlobal
> bd: 89 e0 movl %esp, %eax
> bf: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0, (%eax)
> 000000c1: IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32 _foo
> c5: e8 00 00 00 00 calll 0 <_setfoo+0xC6>
> 000000c6: IMAGE_REL_I386_REL32 _debugPointer
> ca: b9 d5 00 00 00 movl $213, %ecx
> cf: 8b 74 24 2c movl 44(%esp), %esi
> d3: 89 44 24 10 movl %eax, 16(%esp)
> d7: 89 f0 movl %esi, %eax
> d9: 89 54 24 0c m...
2017 Jun 07
2
[newbie] trouble with global variables and CreateLoad/Store in JIT
...bd: 89 e0 movl %esp, %eax
>>> bf: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0, (%eax)
>>> 000000c1: IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32 _foo
>>> c5: e8 00 00 00 00 calll 0 <_setfoo+0xC6>
>>> 000000c6: IMAGE_REL_I386_REL32 _debugPointer
>>> ca: b9 d5 00 00 00 movl $213, %ecx
>>> cf: 8b 74 24 2c movl 44(%esp), %esi
>>> d3: 89 44 24 10 movl %eax, 16(%esp)
>>> d7: 89 f0 movl %esi, %eax
>&g...
2017 Jun 06
2
[newbie] trouble with global variables and CreateLoad/Store in JIT
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Nikodemus Siivola <
nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:
> Uh. Turns out that if I hide the pointer to @foo from LLVM by passing it
> through an opaque identity function ... then everything works fine.
>
> Is this a bug in LLVM or is there some magic involving globals I'm
> misunderstanding?
>
This looks like a bug in the handling of
2017 Apr 04
47
[Bug 100567] New: Nouveau system freeze fifo: SCHED_ERROR 0a [CTXSW_TIMEOUT]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100567
Bug ID: 100567
Summary: Nouveau system freeze fifo: SCHED_ERROR 0a
[CTXSW_TIMEOUT]
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau