Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "0000009d".
Did you mean:
00000097
2011 Oct 10
1
Help. Not a graphics program does not run.
...1 EFLAGS:00210286( R- -- I S - -P- )
EAX:ffffffff EBX:00000000 ECX:7cbcae60 EDX:00000001
ESI:7cd727f0 EDI:00000008
Stack dump:
0x0033cf18: 00000000 7cbcae60 7cd727f0 00000001
0x0033cf28: 682b53c0 682b3ff4 682b53c0 7cbcae60
0x0033cf38: 00000000 00000001 00000001 00000000
0x0033cf48: 7cd727f0 0000009d 7cd3fe24 435cdbb6
0x0033cf58: 00000000 7cbcae60 7cd727f0 00000001
0x0033cf68: 00018af8 00000001 00000001 00000000
Backtrace:
0x435cd6c5: call *%eax
Modules:
Module Address Debug info Name (115 modules)
PE 400000- 4fc000 Deferred benchmark
PE 830000- 8a7000 Deferred benchmark...
2008 Jun 26
5
Can not run DVDSubEdit (Help!)
...00000074 -1
0000007d -1
00000034 -1
00000091 -1
00000086 -1
00000026 -1
0000009f -1
000000be -1
00000097 -1
0000006e -1
00000088 -1
00000096 -1
00000027 -1
000000c2 -1
00000037 -1
0000003b -1
0000006c -1
00000046 -1
000000a5 -1
00000021 -1
0000009d -1
0000004d -1
00000083 -1
00000019 -1
000000b4 -1
0000005d -1
0000006d -1
00000051 -1
00000061 -1
00000050 -1
00000045 -1
00000022 -1
00000028 -1
0000003f -1
00000056 -1
00000054 -1
000000b2 -1
0000003c -1
00000093 -1
00000029 -1
00000098...
2007 Dec 27
2
VT-d and the GPU
...010 00e14143 ff1267e6 ff1ebea8 00000000
0000000a 00000000
(XEN) 00000286 00000014 ff1ebefc 00000000 00d80000 ff11fa41
0000e008 00000286
(XEN) ff1fac31 0000000a ff1a1d25 ff1ebf1c ffbcc100 00000001
ff1fac31 ff1ebf08
(XEN) 00000000 00000002 ff1ebf2c ff16e2c9 ff1a1cf4 ff196bba
0000009d 00000000
(XEN) 00000002 00000000 4f742ed4 00000018 ff16e307 ff1c8100
ff1ebf4c ff16e348
(XEN) ff272100 00000018 00000000 ff2570c0 ffbf4300 ff2570c0
ff1ebf8c ff117aba
(XEN) ff2541f0 00000010 ff232900 00000001 2e8216f2 00000068
3079e6b5 00000068
(XEN) 30792365 00000068 ff...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.21160
> -00000450 l O .rodata 0000000f __FUNCTION__.21323
> +00000439 l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.21073
> +00000450 l O .rodata 0000000f __FUNCTION__.21236
> 000019e0 l F .text 00000222 base_alias_check
> 00001cb0 l F .text 0000009d addr_side_effect_eval
> 00001d50 l F .text 00000728 memrefs_conflict_p
> -0000045f l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.21736
> +0000045f l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.21649
> 0000046f l O .rodata 0000000f .str3
> 00002560 l F .text 000001ad fixed_scalar_and_v...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2006 Jul 14
23
[RFC] New shadow paging code
We (Michael Fetterman, George Dunlap and I) have been working over the
last while on a full replacement for Xen''s shadow pagetable support.
This mail contains some design notes, below; a patch against
xen-unstable, giving a snapshot of the current state of the new shadow
code, is at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch
Comments on both are welcome, although the code is not