Displaying 20 results from an estimated 185 matches for "00000007".
Did you mean:
0000000
2015 May 21
1
asterisk 13 webrtc
...671f-8943-4773-9e36-398ef112a22f}
a=rtcp-mux
a=rtpmap:109 opus/48000/2
a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000/1
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=setup:actpass
a=ssrc:1181629171 cname:{dc854b06-da58-45b3-8185-bbc6a57746c0}
<------------->
--- (13 headers 31 lines) ---
[May 19 16:47:43] DEBUG[14160][C-00000007]: chan_sip.c:25444
handle_request_invite: Initializing initreq for method INVITE - callid
cf2990ba- 3f12-3d9e-adb6-52889c414ed3
Using INVITE request as basis request - cf2990ba-3f12-3d9e-adb6-52889c414ed3
Found peer 'vr1a882' for 'vr1a882' from 2.2.2.2:8558
[May 19...
2010 Jun 17
1
applicationmap and ChannelRedirect
...arted music on hold, class 'default', on SCCP/203-0000000c
-- SCCP: Channel '11' freed by schedule.
Output from Asterisk when it doesn't work:
*CLI> -- SEP001121d89b97: (sccp_pbx_softswitch) New call on line 203
-- Executing [201 at home:1] Gosub("SCCP/203-00000007",
"internal-defaults,1") in new stack
-- Executing [internal-defaults at home:1] NoOp("SCCP/203-00000007",
""Lekrummet" <203>") in new stack
-- Executing [internal-defaults at home:2] AGI("SCCP/203-00000007",
"cid_lookup.agi&...
2016 Nov 21
3
Asterisk 13.12.2 : strange queue behaviour
On 21-11-16 15:17, Matthew Jordan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Jonas Kellens
> <jonas.kellens at telenet.be <mailto:jonas.kellens at telenet.be>> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> when using Asterisk version 13.12.2 I notice that it takes up to
> 30 seconds (sometimes even longer) for a call queue to call its
> members.
>
>
2017 Jun 04
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
...-> hylafax
Same procedure: the receiving t38modem(2) sends ReInvite for t.38 - but
this time, the extension / asterisk just ignores it. After the 5. retry
to switch to T.38, asterisk tells:
res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38
request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
=> Why does asterisk reject the switch / ReInvite to T.38 this time? It
never even tried to send it to the ISP!
Thanks for any hint!
Regards,
Michael
2013 Jul 30
2
lxc-enter-namespace error: security model cannot be entered.
...ace to enter the namespaces and security context of the container. But when I do the same thing in debian OS, It reported an error, with details as following:
root@debian:/etc# vir list
Id Name State
----------------------------------------------------
4424 instance-00000007 running
25913 instance-00000008 running
root@debian:/etc# vir dumpxml 4424
<domain type='lxc' id='4424'>
<name>instance-00000007</name>
<uuid>f1ce5360-bb5e-4cfc-b5ef-d05f8db52618</uuid>
<memory unit='KiB'>...
2011 Apr 08
0
488 error in T38 Gatewaying in Asterisk 1.8 with patch 13405
...my dialplan
'_5062XXXXXXX' => 1. Set(FAXOPT(t38gateway)=yes)
[pbx_config]
2. Dial(DAHDI/g0/${EXTEN})
[pbx_config]
3. Hangup()
[pbx_config]
== Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
-- Executing [50624309954 at termination-test:1] Set("SIP/robert-00000007",
"GROUP(customers)=ibasis") in new stack
-- Executing [50624309954 at termination-test:2] Set("SIP/robert-00000007",
"GROUP(termination)=ss7") in new stack
-- Executing [50624309954 at termination-test:3] Set("SIP/robert-00000007",
"FAXOPT(...
2017 Jun 16
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, at 02:13 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
> Has anybody any idea why asterisk drops the media stream in the 200 OK?
> The channel has been T38_ENABLED before! Or is it necessary to add more
> debug code? Who does the negotiating?
> Only asterisk or is pjsip doing some parts, too?
Asterisk does the T.38 negotiation and produces the answer SDP, PJSIP
does the SDP
2010 Nov 24
1
Disable connected line updates for dahdi PRI channel
...;s what happens when external number 87133306 calls into my PRI,
extension 1111 answers, does an attended transfer to 0102, and completes
the transfer. The provider eventually hangs up with "Message not
compatible with call state (101)".
channel.c: Released clone lock on 'SIP/1111-00000007<ZOMBIE>'
channel.c: Done Masquerading DAHDI/i1/87133306-3 (6)
chan_dahdi.c: Requested indication 26 on channel DAHDI/i1/87133306-3
chan_dahdi.c: Requested indication 17 on channel DAHDI/i1/87133306-3
channel.c: Bridge stops because we're zombie or need a soft hangup:
c0=SIP/1111-0000...
2005 Sep 19
0
Interdomain trust relationships
...ILED with error
NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER"
in the winbindd log however I get a message that states "NTLM CRAP
authentication for user [NZA]\[test-user] returned NT_STATUS_OK (PAM: 0)"
Log snippit:
[2005/09/19 13:41:16, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635)
0128 attr : 00000007
[2005/09/19 13:41:16, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635)
012c g_rid: 00002846
[2005/09/19 13:41:16, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635)
0130 attr : 00000007
[2005/09/19 13:41:16, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(635)
0134 g_rid: 00002812
[2005...
2020 Jan 16
1
From the CLI, how can I hangup a channel name that includes a space character?
Thanks Doug.
Turns out if using hangup request does not work with the escaped character
CLI> hangup request PJSIP/1003\ a-00000007
Usage: channel request hangup <channel>|<all>
Request that a channel be hung up. The hangup takes effect
the next time the driver reads or writes from the channel.
If 'all' is specified instead of a channel name, all channels
will see the hangup reque...
2016 Oct 21
2
Problem with REMAINDER? 957%60 be 15 remainder 57 not 15 remainder -3 ?
...EN})
same => n,Set(myNum=957)
same => n,Set(sec=$[REMAINDER(${myNum},60)])
same => n,Set(sec=$[ABS(${sec})])
same => n,Set(sec=$[${MATH(${sec}+0,i)}])
same => n,Verbose(1,${myNum},${sec})
gives me
-- Executing [7 at fromvoipfone201:1] Verbose("PJSIP/6001-00000007",
"Context: fromvoipfone201 Exten:7") in new stack
Context: fromvoipfone201 Exten:7
-- Executing [7 at fromvoipfone201:2] Set("PJSIP/6001-00000007",
"myNum=957") in new stack
-- Executing [7 at fromvoipfone201:3] Set("PJSIP/6001-00000007",
"...
2010 May 15
2
sieve spamtest extension
...7.3 -> "ge" works. #right
If the rule modified to (spamtest :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" "6.0") everything works as expected.
One more thing - sieve-test. I couldn't test my scripts with it:
# sieve-test -x +spamtest -t sieve spam.txt
00000007: SPAMTEST test
00000007: spamtest: extension not configured
00000013: JMPFALSE (false)
Performed actions:
(none)
Implicit keep:
* store message in folder: INBOX
Info: final result: success
2010 Jul 08
1
Problem with call-limit
...nel.c: DTMF end accepted with begin
'#' on SIP/test13-0000000b
[Jul 8 09:46:56] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF end passthrough '#' on
SIP/test13-0000000b
[Jul 8 09:46:56] VERBOSE[22334] logger.c: [Jul 8 09:46:56] --
Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/test3-00000007
[Jul 8 09:46:56] VERBOSE[22334] logger.c: [Jul 8 09:46:56] --
<SIP/test13-0000000b> Playing 'pbx-transfer' (language 'be')
[Jul 8 09:46:57] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF begin '2' received on
SIP/test13-0000000b
[Jul 8 09:46:57] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF begi...
2017 Jun 04
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote:
> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends
> points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite
> may be passing an internal (nat'ed) address to the other and the connection
> will fail...just a though
t38modem -tt -o /var/log/t38modem.log --no-h323 -u 91 --sip-listen
2017 Jun 05
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote:
>
> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output
> in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own
> debug code to see why things are happening as they happen here.
The logic for T.38 negotiation lives all in the res_pjsip_t38 module and
the request to negotiate works using a
2017 Jun 14
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/11/2017 at 06:51 PM Joshua Colp wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 01:47 PM, Joshua Colp wrote:
>> The distributor is in res/res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c, the distributor
>> function being the entry point. That function returning PJ_TRUE
>> indicates to PJSIP that it has been handled and no subsequent modules
>> should be called by that running thread. The
2017 Jun 11
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
<snip>
> >
> > PJSIP uses a dispatch model. The request is queued up, acted on, and
> > then that's it. The act of acting on it removes it from the queue.
>
> That's the *expected* behavior ... . I rechecked again and again. All
> existing tcpdumps. The "resent" package isn't part of
2017 Jun 05
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Joshua Colp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
> > On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
> > >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote:
> > >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are
2014 May 29
1
Voice mail with ODBC
Hi All,
I have an issue on voice mail with odbc in asterisk 11.7 box. Voice message
can be received through Google mail but it doesn't show in phone. The error
messages is as follow and let me get your kind advice.
-- <SIP/0015-00000007> Playing 'auth-thankyou.g722' (language 'en')
[2014-05-28 14:55:13] DEBUG[12260][C-00000006]: app_voicemail.c:3824
last_message_index: Directory
'/var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/default/701/INBOX' has no messages and
therefore no index was retrieved.
== Parsing '/var/...
2017 Jun 16
3
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote:
<snip>
>
> t38modem and asterisk are using
>
> m=image 35622 udptl t38
> ^^^^^
>
> Provider uses
>
> m=image 35622 UDPTL t38
> ^^^^^
>
> Could this be a problem? If I'm sending internal only, it's always
> lowercase.
Looking at the tests we have we