search for: 0.616564

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0.616564".

BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
2014 Oct 13
0
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
Alexey Lapitsky <lex.public at gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs. > > Here's an example of the backtrace: > https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932 > > I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem: > > - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num); > +
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
2014 Oct 07
2
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
Hi, I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs. Here's an example of the backtrace: https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932 I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem: - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num); + BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num && !vq->indirect); Shall I submit the patch or is a more elaborate fix
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
2014 Oct 07
2
BUG_ON in virtio-ring.c
Hi, I'm hitting this bug with both ext4 and btrfs. Here's an example of the backtrace: https://gist.github.com/vzctl/e888a821333979120932 I tried raising this BUG only for direct ring and it solved the problem: - BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num); + BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num && !vq->indirect); Shall I submit the patch or is a more elaborate fix