Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "0.6137".
Did you mean:
0.137
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are
showing slower compile times for many tests.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999>
>
> Run Order Start Time Duration
>
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
-bw
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are
> showing slower compile times for many tests.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
> On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
2012 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Hi Bill,
> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed
down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this.
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> -bw
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Did
2008 Jun 23
3
Simulating Gaussian Mixture Models
Hi,
Is there any package that I can use to simulate the Gaussian
Mixture Model , which is a mixture modeling method that is widely used
in statistical learning theory.
I know there is a mclust, however, I think it is a little bit
different from my problem.
Thanks very much..
regards.
--------------------------
Peng Jiang
??
Ph.D. Candidate
Antai College of Economics &
2012 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
>
> I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed
> down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this.
>
Crumbs.
John, Do you know of anything that went into
2012 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
>> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>>
>>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>>