Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0.5360".
Did you mean:
0.0360
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2013 Feb 01
29
cumulative sum by group and under some criteria
Thank you very much for your reply. Your code work well with this example.
I modified a little to fit my real data, I got an error massage.
Error in split.default(x = seq_len(nrow(x)), f = f, drop = drop, ...) :
Group length is 0 but data length > 0
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:21 PM, arun kirshna [via R] <
ml-node+s789695n4657196h87@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Try this:
>