Displaying 20 results from an estimated 296 matches for "0.49".
Did you mean:
0.4
2010 Apr 23
6
transpose? reshape? flipping? challenge with data frame
Greetings all,
I am having difficulty transposing, reshaping, flipping (not sure which) a data frame which is read from a DBF file. I have tried using t(), reshape() and other approaches without success. Can anyone please suggest an way (elegant or not) of flipping this data around ?
The initial data is like propsum (defined below), and I want it to look like tpropsum once reformed.
>
2005 Dec 05
1
convert list to data frame
Dear R users:
I've a list containing parameters (A , B & C), and I want create a
data frame using data in these list.
> coffee
[[1]]
A B C
1 1 0.5 7.78
2 1 1.0 6.06
3 1 2.0 3.67
4 1 4.0 1.35
5 1 6.0 0.49
6 1 8.0 0.18
[[2]]
A B C
1 2 5 7.78
2 2 10 6.06
3 2 20 3.67
1997 Apr 24
0
R-beta: Re: R-0.49 -- '1 bit' patch for postscript bug
Since it is now deep night in NZ, and the two R&R's did not yet send it to
this list :
!!>> The postscript bug mentioned in 0.49 has a "1 bit" patch:
Replace '0' by '1' in one place of the source and recompile, i.e.,
type 'make' again in $RHOME, i.e. the directory which should end in .../R-0.49
>> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 21:35:41 +1200
1997 Aug 14
0
R-alpha: Re: R-beta: R-0.49 on IRIX6.1 does not compile
>>>>> "XC" == X Cai <caix@isdugp.bham.ac.uk> writes:
XC> Dear Martin, I am sorry to put the message for the alpha testing
XC> software. In fact, when I compiled version R-0.49, the same error
XC> occurred to me. Is R-0.49 also at alpha testing stage? This means
XC> that I cannot use any version of R. Do you have any idea about the
2009 Jan 07
2
OpenBSD TFTPD remap rules
Hi!
I am using OpenBSD 4.4 with the build-in TFTP-Daemon for PXE.
Distributing OpenBSD works fine.
Now I want to distribute OpenBSD and WinPE. I've installed
PXELinux 3.72 and configured it. Works also fine for PXELinux and
distributing OpenBSD.
To distribute WinPE I need a remap rule (\ -> /) for the TFTP-Daemon.
I've created a file /etc/tftpd.remap with the following rule:
rgG \\ /
2012 Jul 30
2
distance matrix and hclustering
Dear R Users,i am very new to R. I want your help on an issue regarding distance matrix and cluster analysis
i had discharge data of 4 rivers(a,b,c,d) in 4 vectors each having 364 values
> dput(qmu)structure(list(a = c(0.26, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.24, 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21, 0.2, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17,
1997 Jun 07
1
R-beta: Encapsulated Postscript output with R-0.49
I've noticed that the postscript files produced by R-0.49
come up inverted in my postscript previewer. Also, they
do not behave like encapsulated postscript files so they
can't be imported into LaTeX documents. If I remove lines
with page-oriented commands like "%%Page", "%%Orientation",
"\bp" and "\ep", the resulting files seem to behave like
1997 May 09
2
R-alpha: R-0.49 / S-plus: "default argument evaluation" bugs and woes
There is a problem with 'default argument evaluation'
when I use an existing function name as argument name :
sintest <- function(x, y = 2, sin= sin(pi/4))
{
## Purpose: Test of "default argument evaluation"
## -------- Fails for R-0.49. Martin Maechler, Date: 9 May 97.
c(x=x, y=y, sin=sin)
}
## R-0.49:
R> sintest(1)
##> Error in sintest(1) : recursive
1997 Apr 24
0
R-beta: Device: PostScript v. 0.49
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Janusz Kawczak Wrote:
>I have a problem with opening the postscript device in the newly
>compiled R (v. 0.49). This problem was not present in 0.16.1 version.
>
>After entering:
><R>postscript("try.ps")
>I get:
>Error in device("postscript", as.character(c(file, paper, family, bg, : unable
>to start device postscript
>
1997 Jun 02
2
R-beta: Postscript command fails
We are getting the following error:
> postscript(file="Rplot.ps")
Error in device("postscript", as.character(c(file, paper, family, bg, :
unable to start device postscript
This is R-0.49 under SunOS 4.1.3 and under Linux (kernel 2.0.0).
The command worked fine on R-0.14 under the 2 above operating systems.
Any ideas?
Ina
1997 Apr 24
1
R-alpha: R-0.49 Patch #1
This patch corrects the broken postscript graphics driver.
If you have already done it by hand ignore this.
Apply this patch within the R-0.49 directory.
The patch is also at the auckland.ftp site and soon at mirrors.
Ross
*** src/unix/PostScript.c.orig Thu Apr 24 21:28:27 1997
--- src/unix//PostScript.c Thu Apr 24 21:28:51 1997
***************
*** 160,166 ****
if(!MatchKey(buf, "C
1997 Aug 14
0
R-alpha: Compiling 0.49 on IRIX6.1
Hi,
I am compiling R-0.49 on my SGI Indigo 2 R8000 machine and it stopped
in the middle. Could anyone help me to fix it?
Many thanks!
--
Xiaoming Cai
School of Geography
.&______~*@*~______&. University of Birmingham
"w/%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\w" Edgbaston, Birmingham
2012 Sep 28
2
Converting array to matrix
Hi,
I have a 3d array as below, I want to make this array to a matrix of p=50(rows) and n=20(columns) with the coverage values .
The code before the array is:
library(binom)
Loading required package: lattice
pi.seq<-seq(from = 0.01, to = 0.5, by = 0.01)
no.seq<-seq(from = 5, to = 100, by = 5)
cp.all = binom.coverage( p = pi.seq, n = no.seq , conf.level = 0.95, method = "exact")
1997 May 05
0
R-beta: R 0.49 -- "funny" bug: beta(.) gives lbeta(.); lbeta(a,b) gives a
[I send this to R-help, since the bug may affect users..]
The beta(.) and ln(beta(..)) functions are not giving proper results in
R-0.49.
This does NOT affect usual beta-distribution calculations, since the
internal beta(.) and lbeta(.) are okay.
beta(1,2)
[1] -0.6931472
exp(beta(1,2))
[1] 0.5
lbeta(3,4)
[1] 3
------- For R-devel'ers :
Using gdb clearly shows that
beta(.) really
1997 Jun 10
0
R-beta: Compiling 0.49 on IRIX6.1
Hi there,
I am compiling R-0.49 on my SGI Indigo 2 R8000 machine and it stopped
in the middle. Could anyone help me to fix it?
Many thanks!
p.s.: The last lines of message:
cc -g -I../include -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -c regerror.c
cc -g -I../include -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -c regexec.c
"engine.c", line 604: warning(1110): statement is unreachable
break;
^
"engine.c", line 610:
1997 Apr 23
0
R-beta: Version 0.49 Addendum
I should mention that this version of R has been verified to configure
and compile on the following platforms:
PLATFORM COMPILER
alpha-dec-osf3.2 cc
hppa1.1-hp-hpux9.07 gcc or c89
i386-unknown-freebsd2.1.5 gcc
i686-unknown-linux gcc
mips-sgi-irix6.2 cc
1997 Apr 23
0
R-beta: Version 0.49 Addendum
I should mention that this version of R has been verified to configure
and compile on the following platforms:
PLATFORM COMPILER
alpha-dec-osf3.2 cc
hppa1.1-hp-hpux9.07 gcc or c89
i386-unknown-freebsd2.1.5 gcc
i686-unknown-linux gcc
mips-sgi-irix6.2 cc
1997 Apr 24
1
R-beta: R beta 0.49
I reported bugs in "rhyper" and the TASKS.OLD file claims that they have been
fixed. But R continues to get stuck (the prompt never comes back) if I use
rhyper with N1, N2, n large, for example "rhyper(5,200,250,60)".
E. S. Venkatraman (venkat at biosta.mskcc.org)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
r-help mailing list -- Read
1997 Apr 28
3
R-alpha: R-0.49: 2 problems
I found the following 2 problems (no debugging, sorry).
* qt(0.975, 3) never returns.
Can someone please check that? Happens for me on Debian GNU/Linux/ix86
compiled with CFLAGS="-O2 -g".
* Yet another stupid way to cause a segfault:
R> x
Error: Object "x" not found
R> debug(t.test)
R> t.test(rnorm(10))
debug: choices <- c("two.sided",
2003 Apr 11
2
princomp with not non-negative definite correlation matrix
$ R --version
R 1.6.1 (2002-11-01).
So I would like to perform principal components analysis on a 16X16
correlation matrix, [princomp(cov.mat=x) where x is correlation matrix],
the problem is princomp complains that it is not non-negative definite.
I called eigen() on the correlation matrix and found that one of the
eigenvectors is close to zero & negative (-0.001832311). Is there any
way