search for: 0.4284

Hi list, One of my co-workers found this problem with 'cor' in his code and I confirm it too (see below). He's using R 2.2.1 under Win 2K and I'm using R 2.3.0 under Win XP. =========================================== > R.Version() $platform [1] "i386-pc-mingw32" $arch [1] "i386" $os [1] "mingw32" $system [1] "i386, mingw32" $status

Dear R users, I'm trying to fit a gamma-frailty model on a simulated dataset, with 6 covariates, and I'm running into some results I do not understand. I constructed an example from my simulation code, where I fit a coxph model without frailty (M1) and with frailty (M2) on a number of data samples with a varying degree of heterogeneity (I'm running R 2.3.1, running takes ~1 min).

Dear all, I would like to carry out a stepwise regression using the function step. If I use either ~ (A + B + C + D)^4 or explicitly all main effects and interactions for the scope argument, the procedure only considers the four main effects for addition or elimination in each iteration step. What did I do wrong? I'm using R version 1.1.1 on Windows NT. (I'm sorry if this is a stupid

Hello, I have been fitting nonlinear models with random effects using nlme with the corCAR1 correlation structure, as I have unequally spaced observations per subject, and serially correlated errors. My question is regarding the Phi parameter. Example of output: Correlation Structure: Continuous AR(1) Formula: ~day | subject Parameter estimate(s): Phi 0.8475842 After reading

Dear All, I have two factors: GROUP and PATIENT, where PATIENT is nested within GROUP. >levels(example$GROUP) [1] "0" "1" "2" "3" "4" > levels(example$PATIENT) [1] "1" "2" "3" There are three observations at each combination of these factors. However, there are no observations for PATIENT = 3 and GROUP

Dear all, I'm working on a data.frame named en.data, which has n cases and m columns. I generate the correlation matrix of en.data by > cor(en.data) I find that there is no p-value on each correlation in the correlation matrix. I searched in the R-help mail list and found some related posts, but I didn't find direct way to solve the problem. Someone said to use cor.test() or

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When