search for: 0.4280

Two time series questions: FITTING TRANSFER FUNCTIONS WITH LAGS: Consider the following toy example: > dates <- paste(11:21, "/01/2005", sep="") > Dates <- as.Date(dates, "%d/%m/%Y") > set.seed(1) > DF <- data.frame(date=Dates, y=rnorm(11), x=rnorm(11, 3)) > arima(DF$y, c(1,0,0), xreg=lag(DF$x, 1)) ar1 intercept lag(DF$x,

## The following corrects what I believe to have been an error in my previous post: #### Two time series questions: I. FITTING TRANSFER FUNCTIONS WITH LAGS: Consider the following toy example: > dates <- paste(11:21, "/01/2005", sep="") > Dates <- as.Date(dates, "%d/%m/%Y") > set.seed(1) > DF <- data.frame(date=Dates, y=rnorm(11),

Hi All, I want to extract elements of elements in a list. Here's an example of what I mean: If I create a list: x <- as.list(100) for(loop in c(1:100)) { x[[loop]] <- summary(runif(100)) } > head(x) [[1]] Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.02271 0.25260 0.58130 0.52120 0.77270 0.99670 [[2]] Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.006796 0.259700

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download