search for: 0.3493

I have run a t.test in R, and received these results: Two Sample t-test data: rsa and umple t = 0.9819, df = 10, p-value = 0.3493 alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: -76.1541 196.1541 sample estimates: mean of x mean of y 508.3333 448.3333 Can someone give me a detailed interpretation of the above results? Specifically,

Dear mixed-modelers, I have built a mixed model and I'm having serious trouble with interpreting the output. I want to test differences in the coefficient of variation (CV) of light across 3 tree crown exposures (Depth). I have measured direct and diffuse radiation (RF) and I want to test for differences for each kind of radiation between crown exposures, as well as differences between

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? > > I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed > down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. > Crumbs. John, Do you know of anything that went into