Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "0.33333".
Did you mean:
0.333333
2017 Jul 28
3
problem with "unique" function
I have the joint distribution of three discrete random variables z1, z2 and
z3 which is captured by "z"
and "prob" as described below.
For example, the probability for z1=0.46667, z2=-1 and z3=-1 is 2.752e-13.
Also, the probability adds up to 1.
> head(z) z1 z2 z3
[1,] -0.46667 -1.0000 -1.0000
[2,] -0.33333 -0.9333 -0.9333
[3,] -0.20000 -0.8667 -0.8667
2017 Jul 28
0
problem with "unique" function
Most likely, previous computations have ended up giving slightly different values of say 0.13333. A pragmatic way out is to round to, say, 5 digits before applying unique. In this particular case, it seems like all numbers are multiples of 1/30, so another idea could be to multiply by 30, round, and divide by 30.
-pd
> On 28 Jul 2017, at 17:17 , li li <hannah.hlx at gmail.com> wrote:
2004 Jun 24
0
tree model with at most one split point per variable
I would like to create a tree model with at most one split point per variable
using tree, rpart or other routine. Its OK if a variable enters at more
than one node but if it does then all splits for that variable should be
at the same point. The idea is that I want to be able to summarize the
data as binary factors with the chosen split points. I don't want to
have three level or more
2008 Apr 06
1
row by row similarity
Hello all and thanks in advance for any advice.
I am very new to R and have searched my question but have not come up with
anything quite like what I would like to do.
My problem is:
I have a data set for individuals (rows) and values for behaviours
(columns). I would like to know the proportion of shared behaviours for all
possible pairs of individuals. The sum of shared behaviours divided by
2009 Sep 30
5
Rounding error in seq(...)
Hi,
Today I was flabbergasted to see something that looks like a rounding
error in the very basic seq function in R.
> a = seq(0.1,0.9,by=0.1)
> a
[1] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
> a[1] == 0.1
[1] TRUE
> a[2] == 0.2
[1] TRUE
> a[3] == 0.3
[1] FALSE
It turns out that the alternative
> a = (1:9)/10
works just fine. Are there any good guides out there on how to deal
2009 Jun 14
1
time function behavior for ts class objects
Hi all-
I am trying to use the time function for ts class objects and do not
understand the return value. I want to use it to set up a time trend in
arima fits. It does not seem to return a correct linear sequence that
matches the underlying time series. I am running:
R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22).
For example:
R> ## create a time series
R> x <- rnorm(24)
R> (xts <-
2009 Nov 16
2
^ operator
Hi,
I want to apply ^ operator to a vector but it is applied to some of the elements correctly and to some others, it generates NaN. Why is it not able to calculate -6.108576e-05^(1/3) even though it exists?
tmp
[1] -6.108576e-05 4.208762e-05 3.547092e-05 7.171101e-04 -1.600269e-03
> tmp^(1/3)
[1] NaN 0.03478442 0.03285672 0.08950802 NaN
> -6.108576e-05^(1/3)
[1]
2006 Apr 30
4
Adding values from a db the rails way?
I have a log table which has a column recording the number of hours
worked on a task. So there''ll be multiple lines for a particular task.
I want to retrieve the total number of hours worked on a task, so that I
can include the information when one views the task details.
I can write a sql query to do this easily enough, like "SELECT
SUM(hours) AS total FROM tasklog WHERE
1999 Nov 30
3
model.tables
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text
Size: 3126 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19991130/5cb00c0f/attachment.pl
2011 Jun 01
3
Zero-inflated regression models: predicting no 0s
Hi all,
First post for me here, but I have been reading on the forum for almost two
years now. Thanks to everyone who contributed btw!
I have a dataset of 4000 observations of count of a mammal and I am trying
to predict abundance from a inflated-zero model as there is quite a bit of
zeros in the response variable.
I have tried multiple options, but I might do something wrong as every