search for: 0.2227

Hello, my question is about the data handling. I have a data set that is lined as: 4 1 17 1 1 -5.1536 -0.1668 -2.3412 -0.5062 0.9621 0.3640 0.3678 -0.5081 -0.2227 0.8142 -0.0389 -0.0445 -0.0578 -0.1175 -0.1232 0.8673 -0.1033 -0.0796 -0.0341 -0.1716 -0.1801 -0.7014 0.6578 0.5611 4 1 17 2 1 -5.1536 -0.1668 -2.3412 -0.5062 0.9621 0.3640 0.3678 -0.5081 -0.2227 0.8142 -0.0389 -0.0445

Hi, R-users, data is a matrix like this AMR BS GE HR MO UK SP500 1974 -0.3505 -0.1154 -0.4246 -0.2107 -0.0758 0.2331 -0.2647 1975 0.7083 0.2472 0.3719 0.2227 0.0213 0.3569 0.3720 1976 0.7329 0.3665 0.2550 0.5815 0.1276 0.0781 0.2384 1977 -0.2034 -0.4271 -0.0490 -0.0938 0.0712 -0.2721 -0.0718 1978 0.1663 -0.0452 -0.0573 0.2751 0.1372 -0.1346

Dear Rusers, I am now using R and SAS to fit the piecewise linear functions, and what surprised me is that they have a great differrent result. See below. #R code--Knots for distance are 16.13 and 24, respectively, and Knots for y are -0.4357 and -0.3202 m.glm<-glm(mark~x+poly(elevation,2)+bs(distance,degree=1,knots=c(16.13,24)) +bs(y,degree=1,knots=c(-0.4357,-0.3202

Hello R-list, I am trying to calculate a ridge regression using first the *lm.ridge()* function from the MASS package and then applying the obtained Hoerl Kennard Baldwin (HKB) estimator as a penalty scalar to the *ols()* function provided by Frank Harrell in his Design package. It looks like this: > rrk1<-lm.ridge(lnbcpc ~ lntex + lnbeerp + lnwinep + lntemp + pop, subset(aa,

I have a dataframe called "data" with 5 records (in rows) each of which has been scored on each of many variables (in columns). Five of the variables are named var1, var2, var3, var4, var5 using headers. The other variables are named using other conventions. I can create a new variable called var6 with the value 15 for each record with this code: > var6=var1+var2+var3+var4+var5