search for: 0.178

This is a patch that I've had kicking around that I never sent in. With it applied I can compile the module programs from module-init-tools: diff -uNr klibc-0.178/include/sys/elf32.h klibc-0.178-fogo/include/sys/elf32.h --- klibc-0.178/include/sys/elf32.h 2004-01-30 14:40:51.000000000 -0700 +++ klibc-0.178-fogo/include/sys/elf32.h 2004-09-20 09:15:58.000000000 -0600 @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no

Kevin Wright wrote: > library(nlme) > m2 <- gnls(conc ~ t1*(1-t2*exp(-k*time)), > data = df.Chloride, > start = list( > t1 = 35, > t2 = 0.91, > k = 0.22)) So my error was to use nls instead that gnls. Thanks a lot, Kevin. > summary(m2) > plot(m2) > lag.plot(resid(m2), do.lines=FALSE) >

Dear R users I have a big matrix like 6021 1188 790 290 1174 1015 1990 6613 6288 100714 6021 1 0.658 0.688 0.474 0.262 0.163 0.137 0.32 0.252 0.206 1188 0.658 1 0.917 0.245 0.331 0.122 0.148 0.194 0.168 0.171 790 0.688 0.917 1 0.243 0.31 0.122 0.15 0.19 0.171 0.174 290 0.474

Hi All, I'm using the following code to produce some stacked bar graphs. *setwd("C:\\Users\\Tinus\\Documents\\NMMU\\R\\Seamounts")* *SChla <- read.csv("SM_Chla_data.csv")* * * *#Extract mean values from data file* * * *Coral <- SChla[185:223,] #Reduce SChla to Coral only* *coral <- with(Coral , aggregate(cbind(Pico, Nano, Micro), list(Depth),FUN=mean))*

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

My question is about the "Signif. codes" and the p-value, specifically, the output when I run summary(nameofregression.lm) So you get this little key: Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 And on a regression I ran, next to the intercept data, I get '***' Coefficients: > > Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) > >

Hi, I am currently doing logistic regression analyses and I am trying to get confidence intervals for my partial logistic regression coefficients. Supposing I am right in assuming that the formula to estimate a 95% CI for a log odds coefficient is the following: log odds - 1.96*SE to log odds + 1.96*SE then I am not getting the right CI. For instance, this is a summary of my model:

I am using acf() to get the autocorrelations of a time series. It works but I want to then get the autocorrelations into a simple list of numbers. > x <- acf(price_changes, lag.max = 12,type = "correlation",plot = FALSE) > x Autocorrelations of series ‘price_changes’, by lag 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.000

Hello, I am having hard time obtaining a value from a function. "fit" is a survival function that produces some results, such as "median", "confidence intervals" etc. But str() function does not list these values. How can I extract these to be able use them? For example, I need "median" value for the group DrugA which is 48. "Print" function does

Dear list, I am facing an unusual situation where I need to create two sets of legends based on the color mapping. Can't get exactly what I want and really appreciate any advice from ggplot experts. Let's say I have the first dataset "df1" that draws some points and based on which a "loess" line with confidence interval is added. Then the second dataset

I would like to know if it is possible to perform negative binomial regression with rate data (incidence density) using the glm.nb (in MASS) function. I used the poisson regression glm call to assess the count of injuries across census tracts. The glm request was adjusted to handle the data as rates using the offset parameter since the population of census tracts can vary by a factor of

Odd behaviour of function cor() in R-2.10.1-64bit-Unix In a dataset with 1366 patients and 244 clinical variables Spearman's Rho was calculated for some fatty acids and BMI and came over something rather odd: R seems to calculate Rho differently on 2.10.1-64bit-Unix and 2.9.0-32bit-Windows when I calculate the complete (244x244) correlation matrix and then pick out the values I am

Can anyone help explain to me why the two codes below have different result? I thought I can use log(time)~. to replace log(time)~dist+climb+timef.I am using CVlm from DAAG package. I think nihills is preloaded with the package. Thanks in advance. > CVlm(df=nihills, form.lm=formula(log(time)~.),plotit="Observed",m=2)Analysis of Variance Table Response: log(time) Df Sum Sq

Dear R helpers, I have been using the loadings function from the multiv library and I get the typical output (see below). When I try to export these results to a file using a write.table() I get the following error message "Error in as.data.frame.default(x[[i]], optional = TRUE) : can't coerce loadings into a data.frame" Any idea why write.table is doing that and any

Hi R users: What is the difference between in the computation of the diag of the "hat" matrix in: "lm.influence" and the matrix operations with "solve()" and "t()"? I mean, this is my X matrix x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 [1,] 0.297 0.310 0.290 0.220 0.1560 [2,] 0.360 0.390 0.369 0.297 0.2050 [3,] 0.075 0.058 0.047 0.034 0.0230 [4,] 0.114 0.100

Dear all,I am a new user of WinBUGS and need your help. After running the following code, I got parameters of beta0 through beta4 (stats, density), but I don't know how to get the prediction of the last value of h, the variable I set to NA and want to model it using the following code.Does anyone can given me a hint? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.Best

I am trying to use t.test on the following data: date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE RMSE CRCF 2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502 0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164 -1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056 2001-06-15 avn

Dear R Users on a self-written function for calculating maximum likelihood probability (plz check function code at the bottom of this message), one value, wden, suddenly jump to zero. detail info as following: w[11]=2.14 lnw =2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182 0.178 0.179... w[11]=2.14 lnw=2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182

Hi, I am using R to do a principal components analysis for a class which is generally using SPSS - so some of my question relates to SPSS output (and this might not be the right place). I have scoured the mailing list and the web but can't get a feel for this. It is annoying because they will be marking to the SPSS output. Basically I'm getting different values for the component