search for: 0.168

Hello, I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 p770) installation. yum update stops with Error: Multilib version problems found. [..] Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != systemd-libs-219-42.el7_4.1.ppc64 When I scroll back through the transaction check I see various package dependencies for *.ppc instead of *.ppc64. First appearance in

Yep. This worked. Thanks! Why yum can't figure this out itself? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 09/18/2017 08:18 AM, Armin Kunaschik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 >> p770) installation. >> yum update stops with >> Error: Multilib

On 09/18/2017 08:18 AM, Armin Kunaschik wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 > p770) installation. > yum update stops with > Error: Multilib version problems found. > [..] > Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != > systemd-libs-219-42.el7_4.1.ppc64 > > When I scroll back through the

Dear R users I have a big matrix like 6021 1188 790 290 1174 1015 1990 6613 6288 100714 6021 1 0.658 0.688 0.474 0.262 0.163 0.137 0.32 0.252 0.206 1188 0.658 1 0.917 0.245 0.331 0.122 0.148 0.194 0.168 0.171 790 0.688 0.917 1 0.243 0.31 0.122 0.15 0.19 0.171 0.174 290 0.474

On 18/09/17 15:18, Armin Kunaschik wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 > p770) installation. > yum update stops with > Error: Multilib version problems found. > [..] > Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != > systemd-libs-219-42.el7_4.1.ppc64 > > When I scroll back through the

yum currently has issues with obsoletes .. especially when something like a noarch file gets obsoleted by an $arch type rpm and there are 2 (multi) arches available to replace it. It pulls in BOTH, not just the one arch you have installed .. and that then pulls in deps for the 2nd arch that you don't currently have. Hopefully they will fix this. There is an option called multilib_policy BUT

Hello, I'm taking 7.4 for a spin.? I did the minimal install, and ran into trouble with groupinstall base.? The trouble seems to stem from elfutils.? One command claims elfutils-libs-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 is missing, and another one claims it's installed.? Not sure what's going on here. [root at ip-172-31-34-187 ~]# yum -y install elfutils.x86_64 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror

Full_Name: Cuvelier Etienne Version: R version 2.2.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (81.240.71.204) If we use the "density" function "far" from the data, some values are negatives. I know that these value of the density are "near equal" to zero, but the change of sign can involve some "false" decision. Here is an example of this fact: > x =

On 09/10/2017 04:14 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: > Hello, > > I'm taking 7.4 for a spin.? I did the minimal install, and ran into > trouble with groupinstall base.? The trouble seems to stem from > elfutils.? One command claims elfutils-libs-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 is > missing, and another one claims it's installed.? Not sure what's going > on here. > > [root at

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

I have a question, I generated some data and tried survreg to analyze them, but here, I want to get the covariance matrix of the coefficients. I know how to get corr from survreg, say, summary(f,corr=T), but how to get covariance matrix of the coefficient ? can I put them in a matrix and output ? thanks below is what I did <mailto:r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch> n=100; beta=1.0

Hi guys... I have problem with this excersise... Consider the pressure data frame again. (a) Plot pressure against temperature, and use the following command to pass a curve through these data: > curve((0.168 + 0.007*x)?(20/3), from=0, to=400, add=TRUE) (b) Now, apply the power transformation y3/20 to the pressure data values. Plot these transformed values against temperature. Is a linear

Hi, I am experimenting with using glht() from multcomp package together with coxph(), and glad to find that glht() can work on coph object, for example: > (fit<-coxph(Surv(stop, status>0)~treatment,bladder1)) coxph(formula = Surv(stop, status > 0) ~ treatment, data = bladder1) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p treatmentpyridoxine -0.063 0.939 0.161

Dear R helpers, I have been using the loadings function from the multiv library and I get the typical output (see below). When I try to export these results to a file using a write.table() I get the following error message "Error in as.data.frame.default(x[[i]], optional = TRUE) : can't coerce loadings into a data.frame" Any idea why write.table is doing that and any

Support Requests item #1813, was opened at 2005-04-20 23:48 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=412&aid=1813&group_id=85 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Copeland (tom) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Merely a test Initial Comment: Hm, did this go to to win32utils-devel? Tom

Hi, In the following results I interpret exp(coef) as the factor that multiplies the base hazard rate if the corresponding variable is TRUE. For example, when the bucket is ks008 and fidelity <= 3, then the rate, compared to the base rate h_0(t), is h(t) = 0.200 h_0(t). My question is then, to what case does the base hazard rate correspond to? I would expect the reference to be the first

Hi, In my analysis of impacts of insecticide-treated bednets on malaria, I look at the relationship between malaria incidence and mosquito behaviors. The condensed data set is copied here. Ordinary regression (lm) shows that Incidence was negatively related to Mortality. This makes sense because the latter reflected the strength of killing mosquitoes by insecticide-treated nets. Since the

I am trying to investigate the interaction term in the below. The paradigm in aquatic systems is that algal production is either nitrogen (TIN) or Phosphorus limited, and I am trying to investigate this- what is the best way to go about investigating the interaction term. I have some thoughts on the above, but I will withhold them to see what others think. Thanks for your help. d <-

On 04/10/2016 03:27 PM, Fabien Tarrade wrote: > Hi Duncan, >> Didn't you post the same question yesterday? Perhaps nobody answered >> because your question is unanswerable. > sorry, I got a email that my message was waiting for approval and when I > look at the forum I didn't see my message and this is why I sent it > again and this time I did check that the

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no