Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "0.1480".
Did you mean:
0.0480
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote:
>> point taken. thanks!
>
>
> Whatever I try I get something like this:
>
> ggreif$ cd MultiSource/
> ggreif$ make
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/
> burg.linked.rbc'. Stop.
> make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2
> make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2
This is the
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > heisenbug wrote:
> > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> > >>>
2012 May 15
0
Ordinal Logistic regression
Dear All,
I am new to ordinal logistic regression. Using ordinal regression within the R Commander GUI, I have generated an independent variable that is significant, but whose 95% confidence intervals slightly crosses "1". Is this possible? Here is the syntax and output:
polr(formula = CDIcat ~ Employment, data = CDIallvariables, Hess = TRUE,
method = "logistic")
2012 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
>> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>>
>>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>>
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download