Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "0.1196".
Did you mean:
0.11.6
2011 Sep 09
2
Different results with arima in R 2.12.2 and R 2.11.1
Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima:
p=9
d=1
q=2
P=0
D=1
Q=1
S=12
In R 2.12.2
Call:
arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q),
period = S),
optim.control = list(reltol = tol))
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8
ar9
0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811
2011 Sep 12
1
Difference in function arima estimation between 2.11.1 and R 2.12.2
Hello , I have estimated the following model, a sarima:
p=9
d=1
q=2
P=0
D=1
Q=1
S=12
In R 2.12.2
Call:
arima(x = xdata, order = c(p, d, q), seasonal = list(order = c(P, D, Q),
period = S),
optim.control = list(reltol = tol))
Coefficients:
ar1 ar2 ar3 ar4 ar5 ar6 ar7 ar8
ar9
0.3152 0.8762 -0.4413 0.0152 0.1500 0.0001 -0.0413 -0.1811
2010 May 13
1
tune svm
Hello, I hope you can help me!
I`m trying to tune svm parameters: cost and gamma for a landsat image
classification, but I get an error and I can't understand it.
I write this:
> tune(svm, Class~., data = mdt01bis, ranges = list(gamma = 2^(-15:3), cost
> = 2^(-5:15)))
and R gives:
Error en predict.svm(model, if (!is.null(validation.x)) validation.x else if
(useFormula)
2012 May 15
0
Ordinal Logistic regression
Dear All,
I am new to ordinal logistic regression. Using ordinal regression within the R Commander GUI, I have generated an independent variable that is significant, but whose 95% confidence intervals slightly crosses "1". Is this possible? Here is the syntax and output:
polr(formula = CDIcat ~ Employment, data = CDIallvariables, Hess = TRUE,
method = "logistic")
2009 Apr 27
0
VIF's in R using BIGLM
Dear R-help
This is a follow-up to my previous post here:
http://groups.google.com/group/r-help-archive/browse_thread/thread/d9b6f87ce06a9fb7/e9be30a4688f239c?lnk=gst&q=dobomode#e9be30a4688f239c
I am working on developing an open-source automated system for running
batch-regressions on very large datasets. In my previous post, I posed
the question of obtaining VIF's from the output of
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
>
> [...]
>
> 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
> Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite
> (make TEST=nightly report).
>
> Send
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download