Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "0.1099".
Did you mean:
0.10.9
2003 Oct 24
1
gee and geepack: different results?
Hi, I downloaded both gee and geepack, and I am trying to understand the
differences between the two libraries.
I used the same data and estimated the same model, with a correlation
structure autoregressive of order 1. Surprisingly for me, I found very
different results. Coefficients are slightly different in value but
sometimes opposite in sign.
Moreover, the estimate of rho (correlation
2001 May 23
2
help: exponential fit?
Hi there,
I'm quite new to R (and statistics),
and I like it (both)!
But I'm a bit lost in all these packages,
so could someone please give me a hint
whether there exists a package for fitting
exponential curves (of the type
t --> \sum_i a_i \exp( - b_i t))
on a noisy signal?
In fact monoexponential decay + polynomial growth
is what I'd like to try.
Thanks in advance,
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
G'Day Tanya,
Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major
brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6?
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Tanya,
>
>> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
>> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
>> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
>
> I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
> Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
Ok.
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2004 Oct 05
2
Nelson-Aalen estimator in R
Hi,
I am taking a survival class. Recently I need to do the Nelson-Aalen
estimtor in R. I searched through the R help manual and internet, but could
not find such a R function. I tried another way by calculating the
Kaplan-Meier estimator and take -log(S). However, the function only
provides the summary of KM estimator but no estimated values. Could you
please help me with this? I would
2004 Mar 24
6
First Variable in lm
Hi all,
I just cannot think of how to do it:
I want to take the first variable (column) of a data frame and regress
it against all other variables.
bla <- function (dat) {
reg <- lm(whateverthefirstofthevariablenamesis ~., data=dat)
return(reg)
}
What kind of function do I have to take instead of the
whateverthefirstofthevariablenamesis,
eval(), substitute(), get(), ...
to
2005 Mar 10
2
Logistic regression goodness of fit tests
I was unsure of what suitable goodness-of-fit tests existed in R for logistic regression. After searching the R-help archive I found that using the Design models and resid, could be used to calculate this as follows:
d <- datadist(mydataframe)
options(datadist = 'd')
fit <- lrm(response ~ predictor1 + predictor2..., data=mydataframe, x =T, y=T)
resid(fit, 'gof').
I set up a