Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "0.1000".
Did you mean:
0.0000
2012 Jun 20
2
lmomco in gev estimation
Hi guys,
I'm trying to use lmomco package. first I did the manual calculation on
what is the estimates scale and location parameter given L-CV=0.2, L1=1000
L-moments and k (shape parameter) =- 0.1. so what i get is:
location: 821.0445
scale: 260.7590
shape: -0.1000
#I assign this as GEV vectors using vec2par
GEVpara2<-vec2par(c( 821.0445 , 260.7590 ,-0.1),'gev')
#then I
2012 Apr 04
1
[LLVMdev] scalar replacement of aggregates slower?
I just upgraded our optimizer to LLVM 3.0 from 2.8 and noticed that the
scalar replacement of aggregates pass takes a lot longer for some code.
Has there been a performance regression in this pass, or does it do more
work?
LLVM 3.0:
Total Execution Time: 1.0600 seconds (1.0526 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall
Time--- --- Name ---
0.5100
2013 Feb 13
2
Need Help Plotting "Line" for multiple linear regression
Hello,
My name is Craig and I need help plotting a "line" for a multiple linear
regression in R.
Here is my sample data (filename: convis.txt)
Output of convis.txt is (vis and density being predictors of either
avoidance or entrance):
vis den avoid entrance
1 10 1 0.0000 0.0000
2 10 3 0.8750 0.0000
3 8 3 0.8180 0.0300
4 8 3 0.6670 0.0667
5 8 1
2006 Aug 04
2
Sampling from a Matrix
Hello all,
Consider the following problem:
There is a matrix of probabilities:
> set.seed(1)
> probs <- array(abs(rnorm(25, sd = 0.33)), dim = c(5,5), dimnames = list(1:5, letters[1:5]))
> probs
a b c d e
1 0.21 0.27 0.50 0.0148 0.303
2 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.0053 0.258
3 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.3115 0.025
4 0.53 0.19 0.73 0.2710 0.656
5 0.11 0.10 0.37 0.1960
2008 May 06
4
General Plotting Question
f <- (structure(list(X = structure(96:97, .Label = c("119DAmm", "119DN",
"119DNN", "119DO", "119DOC", "119Flow", "119Nit", "119ON", "119OPhos",
"119OrgP", "119Phos", "119TKN", "119TOC", "148DAmm", "148DN",
"148DNN", "148DO",
2006 Apr 26
2
garch in tseries
Hello again!
Is there a way to include a mean in the garch function in the
library(tseries), please?
I tried include.mean=T in the function statement but it didn't work
thanks in advance!
R Version 2.2.1 Windows
Sincerely,
Erin
mailto: hodgess at gator.uhd.edu
2011 Sep 07
1
randomForest memory footprint
Hello, I am attempting to train a random forest model using the
randomForest package on 500,000 rows and 8 columns (7 predictors, 1
response). The data set is the first block of data from the UCI
Machine Learning Repo dataset "Record Linkage Comparison Patterns"
with the slight modification that I dropped two columns with lots of
NA's and I used knn imputation to fill in other gaps.
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping
2010 Sep 26
4
How to update an old unsupported package
Hi all,
I have a package that is specific to a task I was repetitively using a
few years ago.
I now needed to run it again with new data.
However I am told it was built with an older version or R and will not work.
How can I tweak the package so it will run on 11.1?
It was a one-off product and has not been maintained.
Is there a way to "unpackage" it and repackage it to work?
I
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
G'Day Tanya,
Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major
brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6?
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2010 Apr 30
0
ROC curve in randomForest
require(randomForest)
rf.pred<-predict(fit, valid, type="prob")
> rf.pred[1:20, ]
0 1
16 0.0000 1.0000
23 0.3158 0.6842
43 0.3030 0.6970
52 0.0886 0.9114
55 0.1216 0.8784
75 0.0920 0.9080
82 0.4332 0.5668
120 0.2302 0.7698
128 0.1336 0.8664
147 0.4272 0.5728
148 0.0490 0.9510
153 0.0556 0.9444
161 0.0760 0.9240
162 0.4564 0.5436
172 0.5148 0.4852
176 0.1730
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Tanya,
>
>> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
>> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
>> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
>
> I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
> Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
Ok.
2013 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] local test-suite failures on linux
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Redmond, Paul <paul.redmond at intel.com> wrote:
> There is almost certainly a bug in lnt or the makefiles.
>
> I changed the body of Burg main to the following:
>
> + printf("Hello World\n");
> + return 0;
>
>
> I re-ran the test-suite again and got the following errors:
>
> --- Tested: 986 tests --
> FAIL:
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2013 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] local test-suite failures on linux
There is almost certainly a bug in lnt or the makefiles.
I changed the body of Burg main to the following:
+ printf("Hello World\n");
+ return 0;
I re-ran the test-suite again and got the following errors:
--- Tested: 986 tests --
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (494 of 986)
FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (495 of 986)
FAIL:
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2015 May 08
3
pregunta
Estimados
Al dirigir la lectura de un folder tYA1.csv me da este error y no me percato del motivo, adjunto archivo. Espero su ayuda
Saludos
Jos?
> setwd("D:/Public/Documents/R/bioimpedancia")
> a<-read.csv("tYA1.csv",header=TRUE, sep=",", dec=".")
Error in read.table(file = file, header = header, sep = sep, quote = quote, :
more
2008 Feb 03
1
Effect size of comparison of two levels of a factor in multiple linear regression
Dear R users,
I have a linear model of the kind
outcome ~ treatment + covariate
where 'treatment' is a factor with three levels ("0", "1", and "2"),
and the covariate is continuous. Treatments "1" and "2" both have
regression coefficients significantly different from 0 when using
treatment contrasts with treatment "0" as the
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download