search for: 0.0999

Hi all, Using: R version 2.8.1 Patched (2009-03-07 r48068) on OSX (10.5.6) with survival version: Version: 2.35-3 Date: 2009-02-10 I get the following using the first example in ?summary.survfit: > summary( survfit( Surv(futime, fustat)~1, data=ovarian)) Call: survfit(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ 1, data = ovarian) time n.risk n.event survival

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

I want to use caret to build a model with an algorithm that actually has no parameters to find. How do I stop it from repeatedly building the same model 25 times? library(caret) data(mdrr) LOGISTIC_model <- train(mdrrDescr,mdrrClass ,method='glm' ,family=binomial(link="logit") ) LOGISTIC_model 528

good day everyone! i have a time series (andong.ts) and fitted and AR() model using the following code andong.ts <- ts(read.table("D:/.../andong.csv", header = TRUE), start = c(1966,1), frequency = 1) ar(andong.ts) Call: ar(x = andong) Coefficients: 1 2 3 0.3117 0.0607 0.0999 Order selected 3 sigma^2 estimated as 0.8443 I am aware that my model is now

On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tanya, > >> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects >> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- >> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. > > I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. > Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > Ok.

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

Jeff, Perhaps I was sloppy with my notation: I want groups >=0 <10 >=10 <20 >=20<30 ...... >=90 <100 In any event, my question remains, why did the four different versions of cut give me the same results? I hope someone can explain to me the function of include.lowest and right in the call to cut. As demonstrated in my example below, the parameters do not seem to alter