Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "0.0964".
Did you mean:
0.0960
2010 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 regressions
Comparing the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for gfortran from
llvm-gcc-4.2 of April 7th, 2010 and September 18th, 2010 (from
the rc2 2.8 release branch), we seem to be regressing in performance
for this release....
================================================================================
Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16
Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4
Compile Command :
2007 Apr 19
2
inconsistent output using 'round'
I am hoping for some advice regarding limiting decimal points to 3.
'Round' produces the desired results except for the 97.5% confidence interval.
Any advice as to how I modify the code to obtain output to 3 decimal
points for all ouput is appreciated,
regards
Bob Green
mod.multgran <-multinom(offence ~ grandiose * violent.convictions,
data = kc, na.action = na.omit)
2003 Dec 02
1
lme: reproducing example
Dear R-community!
I still have the problem reproducing the following
example using lme.
id<-factor(rep(rep(1:5,rep(3,5)),3))
factA <- factor(rep(c("a1","a2","a3"),rep(15,3)))
factB <- factor(rep(c("B1","B2","B3"),15))
Y<-numeric(length=45)
Y[ 1: 9]<-c(56,52,48,57,54,46,55,51,51)
Y[10:18]<-c(58,51,50,54,53,46,54,50,49)
2011 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
> failing here with...
It was broken. I think I've fixed it in reverting 125960.
-eric
2011 Feb 22
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:58:19PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
> > failing here with...
>
> It was broken. I think I've fixed it in reverting 125960.
>
> -eric
Eric,
The llvm-gcc42 bootstrap is fixed in
2002 Oct 11
1
absurd computiation times of lme
Hi,
i've been trying to apply the lme apprach to growth curves
of children, but lme keeps running for ever and ever as
soon as I use a reasonable basis.
First Example:
Data are 39 boys from the Berkeley growth study, each one
measured 31 times at the ages of
1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 8.50
9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 13.50
2011 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc4.2 bootstrap broken?
Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is
failing here with...
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/llvm-gcc42-2.9-0/llvm_gcc42_objdir/./prev-gcc/ -B/sw/lib/llvm-gcc-4.2/x86_64-apple-darwin10/bin/ -c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64.
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When