search for: 0.0882

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "0.0882".

Did you mean: 0.0880
2012 Feb 20
1
chisq.test vs manual calculation - why are different results produced?
Hello, I am trying to fit gamma, negative exponential and inverse power functions to a dataset, and then test whether the fit of each curve is good. To do this I have been advised to calculate predicted values for bins of data (I have grouped a continuous range of distances into 1km bins), and then apply a chi-squared test. Example: > data <- data.frame(distance=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7),
2009 May 18
1
Using apply() and scale() in combination
Hello I am an R newbie, and am coming against a couple of problems when I try and apply the scale function across all the rows of a matrix. ------------------------- #I have a matrix "dt_l". > str(dt_l) num [1:40962, 1:885] 3.04 4.1 3.4 3.58 3.77 ... #I want to convert the values in each row of this matrix into standardised values (mean 0, sd 1). I believe the command for doing
2005 Aug 18
1
GLMM - Am I trying the impossible?
Dear all, I have tried to calculate a GLMM fit with lmer (lme4) and glmmPQL (MASS), I also used glm for comparison. I am getting very different results from different functions, and I suspect that the problem is with our dataset rather than the functions, but I would appreciate help in deciding whether my suspicions are right. If indeed we are attempting the wrong type of analysis, some
2002 Oct 09
3
proc mixed vs. lme
Dear All, Comparing linear mixed effect models in SAS and R, I found the following discrepancy: SAS R random statement random subj(program); random = ~ 1 | Subj -2*loglik 1420.8 1439.363 random effects variance(Intercept) 9.6033 9.604662
2015 Nov 17
12
3.7.1-rc1 has been tagged. Let's begin testing!
Hi, I have just tagged 3.7.1-rc1, so it is ready for testing. As a reminder, when doing regression testing, use the 3.7.0 release as your baseline. Thanks, Tom
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When