Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "0.0882".
Did you mean:
0.0880
2012 Feb 20
1
chisq.test vs manual calculation - why are different results produced?
Hello,
I am trying to fit gamma, negative exponential and inverse power functions
to a dataset, and then test whether the fit of each curve is good. To do
this I have been advised to calculate predicted values for bins of data (I
have grouped a continuous range of distances into 1km bins), and then apply
a chi-squared test. Example:
> data <- data.frame(distance=c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7),
2009 May 18
1
Using apply() and scale() in combination
Hello
I am an R newbie, and am coming against a couple of problems when I try and
apply the scale function across all the rows of a matrix.
-------------------------
#I have a matrix "dt_l".
> str(dt_l)
num [1:40962, 1:885] 3.04 4.1 3.4 3.58 3.77 ...
#I want to convert the values in each row of this matrix into standardised
values (mean 0, sd 1). I believe the command for doing
2005 Aug 18
1
GLMM - Am I trying the impossible?
Dear all,
I have tried to calculate a GLMM fit with lmer (lme4) and glmmPQL
(MASS), I also used glm for comparison.
I am getting very different results from different functions, and I
suspect that the problem is with our dataset rather than the functions,
but I would appreciate help in deciding whether my suspicions are right.
If indeed we are attempting the wrong type of analysis, some
2002 Oct 09
3
proc mixed vs. lme
Dear All,
Comparing linear mixed effect models in SAS and R, I found the following
discrepancy:
SAS R
random statement random subj(program); random = ~ 1 |
Subj
-2*loglik 1420.8 1439.363
random effects
variance(Intercept) 9.6033 9.604662
2015 Nov 17
12
3.7.1-rc1 has been tagged. Let's begin testing!
Hi,
I have just tagged 3.7.1-rc1, so it is ready for testing. As a
reminder, when doing regression testing, use the 3.7.0 release
as your baseline.
Thanks,
Tom
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When