Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "0.0720".
Did you mean:
0.0120
2008 May 06
4
General Plotting Question
f <- (structure(list(X = structure(96:97, .Label = c("119DAmm", "119DN",
"119DNN", "119DO", "119DOC", "119Flow", "119Nit", "119ON", "119OPhos",
"119OrgP", "119Phos", "119TKN", "119TOC", "148DAmm", "148DN",
"148DNN", "148DO",
2008 Oct 20
1
Mclust problem with mclust1Dplot: Error in to - from : non-numeric argument to binary operator
Dear list members,
I am using Mclust in order to deconvolute a distribution that I
believe is a sum of two gaussians.
First I can make a model:
> my.data.model = Mclust(my.data, modelNames=c("E"), warn=T, G=1:3)
But then, when I try to plot the result, I get the following error:
> mclust1Dplot(my.data.model, parameters = my.data.model$parameters, what = "density")
2007 Jan 22
1
Compare effects between lm-models
Dear helpeRs,
I'm estimating a series of linear models (using lm) in which in every
new model variables are added. I want to test to what degree the new
variables can explain the effects of the variables already present in
the models. In order to do that, I simply observe wether these
effects decrease in strength and / or lose their significance.
My question is: does any of you know
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64.
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release