Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "0.0680".
Did you mean:
0.0080
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping
2011 Aug 17
1
contrast package with interactions in gls model
Hi!
I try to explain the efffect of (1) forest where i took samples's soils (*
Lugar*: categorical variable with three levels), (2) nitrogen addition
treatments (*Tra*: categorical variable with two levels) on total carbon
concentration's soil samples (*C: *continue* *variable) during four months
of sampling (*Time:* categorical and ordered variable with four levels).
I fitted the
2001 Jun 07
3
Diag "Hat" matrix
Hi R users:
What is the difference between in the computation of the diag of the
"hat" matrix in:
"lm.influence" and the matrix operations with "solve()" and "t()"?
I mean, this is my X matrix
x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
[1,] 0.297 0.310 0.290 0.220 0.1560
[2,] 0.360 0.390 0.369 0.297 0.2050
[3,] 0.075 0.058 0.047 0.034 0.0230
[4,] 0.114 0.100
2006 Jul 04
0
who can explain the difference between the R and SAS on the results of GLM
Dear friends,
I used R and SAS to analyze my data through generalized linear model, and
there is some difference between them.
Results from R:
glm(formula = snail ~ grass + gheight + humidity + altitude + soiltemr +
airtemr, family = Gamma)
Deviance Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-1.23873 -0.41123 -0.08703 0.24339 1.21435
Coefficients:
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] cfarm-x86-64 x86_64 nightly tester results
This nightly tester is now using an llvm-g++ that produces the new ODR linkage
types. This means that many more functions are being considered by the
inter-procedural optimization passes (for example, "linkonce" functions defined
in a header). The result seems to be pretty huge swings (both good and bad) in
the C++ tests in the testsuite, see below. Note that this tester is often
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When