search for: 0.0661

Dear R users, I have a matrix "final" which looks like this: final oSO4 oNO3 mSO4 mNO3 [1,] 3.3728 0.2110 1.9517421 1.01883602 [2,] 0.8249 0.0697 1.5970292 0.11368781 [3,] 0.2636 0.1004 0.6012445 0.24356332 [4,] 8.0072 0.3443 6.1016998 3.63207149 [5,] 13.5079 0.6593 12.4011068 1.55323386 [6,] 6.1293 0.1989 5.7620926 0.12884845 [7,] 0.6004 0.0661

With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg plugin... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 8 Apr 2011 19:52:56 Test Name :

Dear R-tisans, I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list. I've

Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on those where it does much better than dragonegg? Ciao, Duncan. > With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 > applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hello: > > We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks > socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: > > - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. > - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last > transmitted

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hello: > > We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks > socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: > > - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. > - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last > transmitted

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> Hello: >> >> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This >> breaks >> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: >> >> - Byte Queue Limit depends

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> Hello: >> >> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This >> breaks >> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: >> >> - Byte Queue Limit depends

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Hello: >>> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. >>> This breaks >>>

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Hello: >>> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. >>> This breaks >>>

Hello: We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last transmitted packet to complete. - TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work. This

Hello: We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last transmitted packet to complete. - TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work. This

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download