Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "0.0608".
Did you mean:
0.0600
2009 Jan 23
1
forecasting error?
Hello everybody!
I have an ARIMA model for a time series. This model was obtained through an
auto.arima function. The resulting model is a ARIMA(2,1,4)(2,0,1)[12] with
drift (my time series has monthly data). Then I perform a 12-step ahead
forecast to the cited model... so far so good... but when I look the plot of
my forecast I see that the result is really far from the behavior of my time
2009 Nov 26
1
different fits for geese and geeglm in geepack?
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20091126/7134fc17/attachment-0001.pl>
2012 Jun 19
1
Stepwise Discriminant Analysis - greedy.wilks
I don't understand which is the problem
Could you help me please?
Thanks in advance
Marta
> str(data_indiciN2)
'data.frame': 200 obs. of 36 variables:
$ gruppo: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
$ I001N2: num 19.32 8.22 28.35 7.24 14.7 ...
$ I002N2: num 2.92 2.54 0.11 1.6 7.12 ...
$ I003N2: num -22.362 -0.222 -19.291
2012 Jun 19
0
greedy.wilks
I have used the greedy.wilks to stepwise discriminant analysis, but it
doesn't work with my dataset.
I don't understand which is the problem
Could you help me please?
Thanks in advance
Marta
> str(data_indiciN2)
'data.frame': 200 obs. of 36 variables:
$ gruppo: Factor w/ 2 levels "0","1": 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...
$ I001N2: num 19.32 8.22 28.35 7.24
2009 Mar 09
1
lme anova() and model simplification
I am running an lme model with the main effects of four fixed variables (3
continuous and one categorical – see below) and one random variable. The
data describe the densities of a mite species – awsm – in relation to four
variables: adh31 (temperature related), apsm (another plant feeding mite)
awpm (a predatory mite), and orien (sampling location within plant – north
or south).
I have read
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad!
Ciao, Duncan.
On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
> Current 380