Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0.05662".
Did you mean:
0.0566
2013 Nov 25
4
lmer specification for random effects: contradictory reults
Hi All,
I was wondering if someone could help me to solve this issue with lmer.
In order to understand the best mixed effects model to fit my data, I
compared the following options according to the procedures specified in many
papers (i.e. Baayen
<http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDsQFjAA
2013 Nov 25
0
R: lmer specification for random effects: contradictory reults
Dear Thierry,
thank you for the quick reply.
I have only one question about the approach you proposed.
As you suggested, imagine that the model we end up after the model selection
procedure is:
mod2.1 <- lmer(dT_purs ~ T + Z + (1 +T+Z| subject), data =x, REML= FALSE)
According to the common procedures specified in many manuals and recent
papers, if I want to compute the p_values relative to