search for: 0.0450

Hello, I hope you can help me! I`m trying to tune svm parameters: cost and gamma for a landsat image classification, but I get an error and I can't understand it. I write this: > tune(svm, Class~., data = mdt01bis, ranges = list(gamma = 2^(-15:3), cost > = 2^(-5:15))) and R gives: Error en predict.svm(model, if (!is.null(validation.x)) validation.x else if (useFormula)

Hello, I have an input file: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3700031/testOut.txt testOut.txt where col 1 is chromosome, column2 is start of region, column 3 is end of region, column 4 and 5 is base position, column 6 is total reads, column 7 is methylation data, and column 8 is the strand. I would like a summary output file such as:

I am attempting to use package boot to summarize and compare the performance of three models. I'm using R 2.13.0 in a Win32 environment. My statistic function returns a vector of 6 values, 3 of which are error rates for different models, and 3 are pairwise differences between those error rates. It looks like: multiEst<-function(dat,i) { .... c(E1,E2,E3,E2-E1,E3-E1,E3-E2); }

Hello, I probably have a syntax error in trying to generate an expected survival curve from a weighted cox model, but I can't see it. I used the help sample code to generate a weighted model, with the addition of a "weights=albumin" argument (I only chose albumin because it had no missing values, not because of any real relevance). Below are my code with the resulting error

Hello all R-users _question 1_ I need to make a statistical model and respective ANOVA table but I get distinct results for the T-test (in summary(lm.object) function) and the F-test (in anova(lm.object) ) shouldn't this two approach give me the same result, i.e to indicate the same significants terms in both tests??????? obs. The system has two restrictions: 1) sum( x_i ) = 1 2) sum(

Have you seen how these sub-one-cent companies take off on Good News? For the past two months, every one we have brought you has shown Amazing Appreciation. At such a low price even the smallest Gain means a Significant Percentage Return. We called (P)(P)(T)(L) as one to watch on Friday because of a Highly Anticipated Report from the Field. It moved up 13% on Friday and the news

Hi, I am new to model selection by coefficient shrinkage method such as lasso. And I became particularly interested in variable selection in Cox regression by lasso. I became aware of the coxpath() in R package glmpath does lasso on Cox model. I have tried the sample script on the help page of coxpath(), but I have difficult time understanding the output. Therefore, I would greatly appreciate if

Have you seen how these sub-one-cent companies take off on Good News? For the past two months, every one we have brought you has shown Amazing Appreciation. At such a low price even the smallest Gain means a Significant Percentage Return. We called (P)(P)(T)(L) as one to watch on Friday because of a Highly Anticipated Report from the Field. It moved up 13% on Friday and the news

This may not actually be an R/Splus problem, but it started off that way ..... ===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== Executive summary: ================== Simulations involving extreme value distributions seem to ``work'' when the underlying distribution is exponential(1) or exponential(2) == chi-squared_2, but NOT when the underlying distribution is

> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> 於 2016年11月30日 上午5:14 寫道： > >> >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Bekket McClane via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Though there exists lots of researches on parallelizing or scheduling optimization passes, If you open up the time matrices of