search for: 0.0441

Greetings, I am having a problem with DescTools::Quantile (a function computing quantiles from weighted samples): # these sum to one probWeights = c( 0.0043, 0.0062, 0.0087, 0.0119, 0.0157, 0.0204, 0.0257, 0.0315, 0.0378, 0.0441, 0.0501, 0.0556, 0.06, 0.0632, 0.0648, 0.0648, 0.0632, 0.06, 0.0556, 0.0501, 0.0441, 0.0378, 0.0315, 0.0257, 0.0204, 0.0157, 0.0119, 0.0087,

Dear list, ? would anybody be able to tell me why the statement ? Tripstatistics=aggregate(TripsData[2:3],by=list(Trip=Tripmatch),FUN="mean") ? seems to work well with TripsData 1 but not with TripsData 2 ? ? With TripsData 2 it yields ? Error in FUN(X[[1L]], ...) : arguments must have same length I can't see a difference in the two data sets. Could someone shed light on the error

It looks like a homework assignment. It also looks like you didn't read the documentation carefully enough. The 'len.out' argument in seq is solely for specifying the length of a sequence. The 'quantile' function omputes the empirical quantile of raw data in the vector 'x' at cumulative probabilit(y)(ies) given in the weights' argument, with interpolation I'm

Hello everyone I appologize for my lack of experience in statistical methods. I am an R user begginer and I am running a logit model using "zelig" and "pcse" packages. I will go to the point and is that Im having problems with interpreting the results of my models.. It is really simple (I guess for the most advanced scholars) however I really dont understand how to interpret

Dear R contributors, I have a problem in selecting in an efficient way, rows of a data frame according to a condition, which is a part of a row name of the table. The data frame is made of 64 rows and 2 columns, but the row names are very long but I need to select them according to a small part of it and perform calculations on the subsets. This is the example: X Y "Unique to

I'm pretty new to R and would appreciate some help interpreting the output of a function that was recommended to me. I've used the *envfit *function in the vegan package to plot vectors of four climate variables onto a species matrix ordination. The output indicates that only a single variable (mean_temp) is significant: ***VECTORS NMDS1 NMDS2 r2

Hi, i was working with this model > mq<-glm(rojos~edadysexo*zona*estacion,quasipoisson) and i get this minimal adequate model > anova(mq5,test="F") Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev F Pr(>F) NULL 518 64799 edadysexo 2 1556.5 516 63243 8.9434 0.0001524 *** zona 4

Quoting Francesca PANCOTTO <f.pancotto at unimore.it>: > Dear R contributors, > > I have a problem in selecting in an efficient way, rows of a data > frame according to a condition, > which is a part of a row name of the table. > > The data frame is made of 64 rows and 2 columns, but the row names > are very long but I need to select them according to a small

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download