search for: 0.0391

Dear Catarina, I prefer to leave the AIC value as NA for the tweedie GLM family because it takes extra time to compute and is only occasionally wanted. It's easy to compute the AIC yourself using the dtweedie() function of the tweedie package. Best wishes Gordon At 03:05 AM 14/08/2007, Catarina Miranda wrote: >Dear Gordon; > >I have also sent this email to R help mailing list,

Dear R users; I am modelling densities of some species of birds, so I have a problem with a great ammount of zeros. I have decided to try GLMs with the tweedie family, but in all the models I have tried I got an NA for the AIC value. Just to check the problem I've compared the a glm using the Gaussian family with the identity link and a glm using the tweedie family with var.power=0 and

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Hello Everybody, I have a problem with the output of lm. In fact, when I compare the R output and the Splus output, the results appears to be different : I have a dataframe with 5 factors , 16 rows and a response. First, I tried to fit this response to a linear model : lm(rep~(A+B+C+D+E),data). The results beetween SPlus and R are different. In a second time, I tried a new fit :

Dear All, What is the preferred way to get Bayesian analysis results (such as those from MCMCpacki, MCMCglmm, and DPpackage) into LaTeX table automatically? I have been using the "apsrtable" package and similar functions in "memisc" package, but neither seems to handle MCMC output directly. Many thanks. Shige

hello: my data looks like: time1  time2   event  catagoria 2004    2006        1            C 2004    2005        0            C 2005    2010        1            E 2007    2009        1            C 2006    2007        0            E 2008    2010        0            C 2008    2010        1            E ... and the census interval is 1 year I have tried  this

Hello, I am hoping for some advice regarding warning/error messages I received when running a Cox regression # message 1 - obtained while creating a plot of residuals > plot (NV.zph, main = "groupNUSM - UNFIT", var= 'groupNUSM') Warning messages: 1: In approx(xx, xtime, seq(min(xx), max(xx), length.out = 17)[2 * : collapsing to unique 'x' values 2: In

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

This is a general question about Design of experiments. If i am not allowed to post general questions like this here please accept my apologies and ignore the question. I did a DOE with six factors in eight runs. I know i cannot check for interactions using this design, but i tried the interaction plot and it showed me many interactions. After this I foldover the design and ran the 8 runs to learn

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

R-1.7.0 built on NetBSD 1.6, but the validation test suite failed: Machinetype: Intel Pentium III (600 MHz); NetBSD 1.6 (GENERIC) Remote gcc version: gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 Remote g++ version: g++ (GCC) 3.2.2 Configure environment: CC=gcc CXX=g++ LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib make[5]: Entering directory `/local/build/R-1.7.0/src/library' >>> Building/Updating