Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "0.0269".
Did you mean:
0.0069
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model
2011 Jan 20
1
Problems with ecodist
Dear Dr.Goslee and anyone may intrested in matrix manipulate,
I am using your ecodist to do mantel and partial mantel test, I have
locality data and shape variation data, and the two distance matrixs are
given as belowings. When I run the analysis, it is always report that the
matrix is not square, but I didn't know what's wrong with my data. Would you
please help me on this. I am quite
2010 May 11
1
kernel density to smooth plots
Hi r-sers,
I have a data of relative frequencies for the interval of 0-20, 20-40,...380-400. I would like the two data on the same graph using the same x-axis label. My question is how to get a smooth curve using kernel density code if it possible for this data.
> cbind(rel_obs,rel_gen)
rel_obs rel_gen
[1,] 0.000000000 0.0000
[2,] 0.092534175 0.0712
[3,] 0.105152471 0.1092
2007 Mar 19
1
likelihoods in SAS GENMOD vs R glm
List: I'm helping a colleague with some Poisson regression modeling. He
uses SAS proc GENMOD and I'm using glm() in R. Note on the SAS and R
output below that our estimates, standard errors, and deviances are
identical but what we get for likelihoods differs considerably. I'm
assuming that these must differ just by some constant but it would be nice
to have some confirmation
2012 Aug 02
2
metafor- interpretation of moderators test for raw proportions
Hello metafor users,
I'm using metafor to perform a single-effect summary estimate of the raw
proportion of patients experiencing a post-operative complication, and I'm
interested in seeing if this proportion differs between the three most
commonly used surgical techniques. The software is working as expected, but
I would like to double check on the interpretation of my mixed-effect model
2003 Jan 20
1
quadratic trends and changes in slopes
I'd like to use linear and quadratic trend analysis in order to find
out a change in slope. Basically, I need to solve a similar problem as
discussed in http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/courses/ed230bc1/cnotes4/trend1.html
My subjects have counted dots: one dot, two dots, etc. up to 9 dots.
The reaction time increases with increasing dots. The theory is that
1 up to 3 or 4 points can be counted
2012 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] costing optimisations
On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>
>> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes.
>>
>>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are
>>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions.
>>
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
>
> [...]
>
> 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
> Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite
> (make TEST=nightly report).
>
> Send
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64.
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download