search for: 0.026

I can't get my simultaneous equations to work using system fit. Please help. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) str(Empdata) Empdata$gnipc<-as.numeric(Empdata$gnipc) install.packages("systemfit") library("systemfit") pdata <- plm.data(Empdata,

Hello, I have built a multi-variate probit model using the package "bayesm", which requires that the X data is constructed using the function "CreateX". I've gone through the documentation and run my model, but wanted to be sure about my interpretation of the results for the coefficients - beta. Steps: 1) I have 5 choices for the dependent variable Y, so p=5 2) I have 8

Sadly you failed to set your email program to send plain text and the data is corrupted at my end. I also think you need to reduce the size of the data set... the intent here is to increase your understanding, not debug your particular analysis. I will say that I am having a very challenging time understanding what you are trying to accomplish though. What are the equations that you think need

Hello, I have built a multi-variate probit model using the package "bayesm", which requires that the X data is constructed using the function "CreateX". I've gone through the documentation and run my model, but wanted to be sure about my interpretation of the results for the coefficients - beta. Steps: 1) I have 5 choices for the dependent variable Y, so p=5 2) I have 8

OK, Let's try this again! Here is the reproducible script; it is long because I had to copy the panel dataset here. My question is related to systemfit; I don't know how to get the result for the entire panel. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) install.packages("systemfit")

R 2.8.1 Windows XP I am trying to plot the results of a coxph using plot(survfit()). The plot should, I believe, show two lines one for survival in each of two treatment (Drug) groups, however my plot shows only one line. What am I doing wrong? My code is reproduced below, my figure is attached to this EMail message. John > #Create simple survival object >

Hello, I am trying to import a list of "structure" objects into R (data for BUGS, actually), but am having little success. In the help file for scan there dies not seem to be a list of valid values for the "what" keyword. Can anyone provide me with one? I have pasted in a sample input file that I am trying to import below this message. I have tried

I was wondering if anyone could help me with this, simple problem. I am essentially following the example on Hadley's webpage (http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/geom_errorbar.html), but it still doesn't make any sense to me. df <- data.frame(trt = factor(c("intact", "intact", "removed", "removed")), coon = c(0.093, 0.06, 0.057, 0.09), group =

... and the mailing list is picky about attachments... whatever you attached did not conform to the stringent requirements mentioned in the Posting Guide. Pasting the code right into the email is usually safest, though you DO have to post using plain text (as the Posting Guide indicates) or your code may get mangled by the automatic html format removal. On May 15, 2018 7:04:31 AM PDT, Bert Gunter

I made an ANOVA with repeated mesures (aov(Mesure~Distance*Genre*Correct+Error(Sujet/(Distance*Genre*Correct)), data)) and I would like to extract the pvalues. The output is: ----------------------------------------------------------- Error: Sujet Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Residuals 21 97.082 4.623 Error: Sujet:Distance Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Distance

En innebygd og tegnsett-uspesifisert tekst ble skilt ut... Navn: ikke tilgjengelig Nettadresse: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060921/b479a8df/attachment.ksh

Unless there is good reason not to, always cc the list -- there are lots of smarter folks than I on it who can help. I may or may not have time to look at this. Hopefully someone else will. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip

On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair Florian wrote: > No you're reading it wrong. > > There are 188K received with no loss, and 16441K transmitted. This doesn't make any sense to me, either. There can't be more packages transmitted than received. It's the same codec in and out and it's been running exactly the same time. > ...........Receive.........

Dear R gurus I am running a GLMM that looks at whether chimpanzees spend time in shade more than sun (response variable 'y': used cbind() on counts in the sun and shade) based on the time of day (Time) and the availability of shade (Tertile). I've included some random factors too which are the chimpanzee in question (Individual) and where they are in a given area (Zone). There are

A couple more data points. Current llvm 3.7svn with the two outstanding OPENMP patches can build the openmp support in gdl 0.9.5 (which completely passes its test suite) and apbs 1.4.1's limited openmp support. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Jack Howarth < howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > On a positive note, current llvm 3.7svn with the two outstanding > OPENMP

Hi Carsten, On 02/11/2018 at 07:46 PM Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi, > > Lost percent (%).... Are you sure? I'm seeing here: ...........Receive......... .........Transmit.......... Count Lost Pct Jitter Count Lost Pct Jitter RTT.... 188K 0 0 0.000 188K 16641K 8809 0.000 0.026 => This doesn't sound reliable to me: there are 188K packets and 16641K

Could this gap in sequence numbers caused by a codec change generate errors like the one below? [2018-02-13 12:57:43] WARNING[4917][C-0004c2cb] codec_sangoma.c: [526559][g722toulaw] Got Seq 15944 but expecting 10106 (time since last read = 0ms), dropped 5838 packets On 02/13/2018 01:24 PM, Andres wrote: > On 2/13/18 11:55 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair

Dear all R users, I am really struggling to determine the most appropriate lag order of ARIMA model. My understanding is that, as for MA [q] model the auto correlation coeff vanishes after q lag, it says the MA order of a ARIMA model, and for a AR[p] model partial autocorrelation vanishes after p lags it helps to determine the AR lag. And most appropriate model choosed by this argument gives

Dear R-users I have a probelm running stepAIC in R1.7.1 I wrote a program which used stepAIC as a part of it, and it worked fine while I was using the previous version of R1.7.0. However, I found the program did not work any more. Now, R produces a message which tells "Error in as.data.frame.default(data) : can't coerce function into a data.frame" every time I run the part of

My question is about the "Signif. codes" and the p-value, specifically, the output when I run summary(nameofregression.lm) So you get this little key: Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 And on a regression I ran, next to the intercept data, I get '***' Coefficients: > > Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) > >