Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "0.0226".
Did you mean:
0.06226
2009 Jun 18
3
how to sort
Hi. I have an object. I think it is a list.
> str(corTFandPCA)
num [1:922, 1:5] -0.0226 -0.0504 -0.0208 -0.0582 -0.0257 ...
- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
..$ : chr [1:922] "abdomen.2" "abdomimal.3" "abdominal.4" "aberration.5"
...
..$ : chr [1:5] "PC1" "PC2" "PC3" "PC4" ...
I want to order it
2009 Oct 07
0
error using predict() / "fRegression"-package
Hello!
I'm puzzled by the following problem. It occurs while trying to predict
responses in a test-dataset using a linear model fitted with regFit from
the rMetrics "fRegression"-package.
All goes well when I call "predict" using the training dataset. However,
a call using the test-dataset retuns an error message - telling me that
the latter dataset provides variables
2005 Sep 05
1
convergence for proportional odds model
Hey, everyone,
I am using proportional odds model for ordinal responses in dose-response experiments. For some samll data, SAS can successfully provide estimators of the parameters, but the built-in function polr() in R fails. Would you like to tell me how to make some change so I can use polr() to obtain the estimators? Or anyone can give me a hint about the conditions for the existance of MLE
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model
2007 Apr 06
0
translating sas proc mixed to lme()
Hi All
I am trying to translate a proc mixed into a lme() syntax. It seems that I was
able to do it for part of the model, but a few things are still different.
It is a 2-level bivariate model (some call it a pseudo-3-level model).
PROC MIXED DATA=psdata.bivar COVTEST METHOD = ml;
CLASS cluster_ID individual_id variable_id ;
MODEL y = Dp Dq / SOLUTION NOINT;
RANDOM Dp Dq / SUBJECT = cluster_ID
2007 Jun 28
0
mixed-effects model using lmer
Hello R-users,
I have been trying to fit what I think is a simple mixed-effects model using lmer (from lme4), but I've run into some difficulty that I have not been able to resolve using the existing archives or Pinheiro and Bates (2000).
I am measuring populations (of birds) which change with time at a number of different sites. These sites are grouped into regions. Sites are not measured
2014 Aug 12
4
[LLVMdev] Explicit template instantiations in libc++
Most of libc++ doesn't have explicit template instantiations, which
leads to a pretty significant build time and code size cost when using
libc++, since a large number of common templates will be emitted by the
compiler and coalesced by the linker. Notably, in include/__config, we
have:
#ifndef _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
#define _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(...)
#endif
whereas before
2011 May 15
5
Question on approximations of full logistic regression model
Hi,
I am trying to construct a logistic regression model from my data (104
patients and 25 events). I build a full model consisting of five
predictors with the use of penalization by rms package (lrm, pentrace
etc) because of events per variable issue. Then, I tried to approximate
the full model by step-down technique predicting L from all of the
componet variables using ordinary least squares
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64.
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release
2016 Nov 30
4
[RFC] Parallelizing (Target-Independent) Instruction Selection
> Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> 於 2016年11月30日 上午5:14 寫道:
>
>>
>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Bekket McClane via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Though there exists lots of researches on parallelizing or scheduling optimization passes, If you open up the time matrices of
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When