search for: 0.0210

Hi, I downloaded both gee and geepack, and I am trying to understand the differences between the two libraries. I used the same data and estimated the same model, with a correlation structure autoregressive of order 1. Surprisingly for me, I found very different results. Coefficients are slightly different in value but sometimes opposite in sign. Moreover, the estimate of rho (correlation

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Dan Dube <ddube-at-advisen.com> wrote: > i use tapply and by often, but i always end up banging my head against > the wall with the output. The proposed solution of Dan's problem posted on R-help was: > do.call(rbind,a) When I use this 'solution' I get 'ERROR: second argument must be a list'. So head on wall continues. My

To whom it may concern: I am trying a factorial design a system of mine that has two factors. Each factor was set at four different levels, with one replication for each of the combinations. My data is as follows: A B Response 1 600 2.5 0.0257 2 600 2.5 0.0254 3 600 5

All - I have data that looks like psd Species Lake Length Weight St.weight Wr Wr.1 vol 432 substock SMB Clear 150 41.00 0.01 95.12438 95.10118 0.0105 433 substock SMB Clear 152 39.00 0.01 86.72916 86.70692 0.0105 434 substock SMB Clear 152 40.00 3.11 88.95298 82.03689 3.2655 435 substock SMB Clear

Version of R: Windows Version 2.0.0 The experimental design contains two plant lines - a control (C) and a mutant (M) - grown out three separate times in plots A, B, C. The design is unbalanced: In plot A, 9 control plants were grown with 29 mutant plants. In plot B, 8 control plants were grown with 20 mutant plants. In plot C, 8 control plants were grown with 22 mutant plants. The

Dear list members, the following hlm was constructed: hlm <- groupedData(laut ~ design | grpzugeh, data = imp.not.I) the grouped data object is located at and can be downloaded: www.anicca-vijja.de/lg/hlm_example.Rdata The following works: library(nlme) summary( fitlme <- lme(hlm) ) with output: ... AIC BIC logLik 425.3768 465.6087 -197.6884 Random effects:

I have a dataframe called "data" with 5 records (in rows) each of which has been scored on each of many variables (in columns). Five of the variables are named var1, var2, var3, var4, var5 using headers. The other variables are named using other conventions. I can create a new variable called var6 with the value 15 for each record with this code: > var6=var1+var2+var3+var4+var5

Hello, Are there any R functions available for performing a serial correlation test for short time series (e.g, series having between 10-14 observations)? Many thanks! Isabella R. Ghement, Ph.D. Ghement Statistical Consulting Company 301-7031 Blundell Road, Richmond, B.C., Canada, V6Y 1J5 Tel: 604-767-1250 Fax: 604-270-3922 E-mail: isabella at ghement.ca Web: www.ghement.ca -----Original

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When