Displaying 20 results from an estimated 31 matches for "0.0039".
Did you mean:
0.003
2006 Jan 31
2
Canadian Termination $0.0039 / Minute
All we have a deal on Canadian termination.
Rate: $0.0039 US Dollars
Billing: 1/1
Protocol: SIP or H323
Codec: G729
Terms: Prepaid Only.
We have a real-time web interface where you can monitor or download your CDR's.
Please e-mail me offlist if you are interested: jweisman@ibell.net
Thanks,
Jon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2010 Jun 18
1
12th Root of a Square (Transition) Matrix
Dear R-tisans,
I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list.
I've
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are
showing slower compile times for many tests.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999>
>
> Run Order Start Time Duration
>
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
-bw
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are
> showing slower compile times for many tests.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
> On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
2012 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
Hi Bill,
> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed
down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this.
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> -bw
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Did
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model
2012 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem?
>
> I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed
> down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this.
>
Crumbs.
John, Do you know of anything that went into
2013 Feb 27
1
metafor - interpretion of QM in mixed-effects model with factor moderator
Hi,
I'm using metafor to perform a mixed-effects meta-analysis. I'd like to
test whether the effect is different for animals and plants/whether "group"
(animal/plant) influences the effect size, but am having trouble
interpreting the results I get. I've read previous posts about QM in
metafor, but I'm still a bit confused. I've dummy-coded the factors:
2017 Dec 20
2
outlining (highlighting) pixels in ggplot2
Using the small reproducible example below, I'd like to know if one can
somehow use the matrix "sig" (defined below) to add a black outline (with
lwd=2) to all pixels with a corresponding value of 1 in the matrix 'sig'?
So for example, in the ggplot2 plot below, the pixel located at [1,3] would
be outlined by a black square since the value at sig[1,3] == 1. This is my
first
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386
autoconf says:
configure:2122: checking build system type
configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
[...]
configure:2721: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305
[...]
objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc.
Release build.
llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
>
> [...]
>
> 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
> Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite
> (make TEST=nightly report).
>
> Send
2008 Aug 05
1
Confidence interval for the coefficient of variation
Dear,
We are trying to determine the (one-sided) CI for the coefficient of
variation in a small sample (say n = 10), with mean 100 and standard
deviation 21.
It appears though that the R-function ci.cv() and our simulation do not
agree.
The R-code:
library(MBESS)
n = 10
ci.cv(mean = 100, sd = 21, n = 10, conf.level = 0.9)
U10.95 <- 0.3551754
ci.cv(mean = 100, sd = 21, n = 10, conf.level =
2012 Jun 25
0
x12 ARIMA Moving Seasonality F Test Issue
I'm having a great deal of trouble replicating x12 ARIMA's F-test used to
detect moving seasonality. According to all literature I could find, the
test is apparently a 2-way ANOVA with year and month as factors for the SI
ratios determined by x12's smoothing algorithm. Note the SI ratio is simply
the detrended series. The summary I get from manually running this 2-way
ANOVA using the
2017 Sep 18
0
how to use cluster volume top command: correct usage?
Dear All,
in order to test my gluster volume performance, I started using gluster volume top command, but something is not clear to me.
If I understand, gluster volume top command doesn?t measure in real time the ?weight? of my running workload, but it executed a ?dd? and mesaures the corresponding throughput.
From the Admin Guide:
"Viewing List of Write Performance on each Brick
You can
2006 Jul 04
0
who can explain the difference between the R and SAS on the results of GLM
Dear friends,
I used R and SAS to analyze my data through generalized linear model, and
there is some difference between them.
Results from R:
glm(formula = snail ~ grass + gheight + humidity + altitude + soiltemr +
airtemr, family = Gamma)
Deviance Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-1.23873 -0.41123 -0.08703 0.24339 1.21435
Coefficients:
2011 Feb 15
1
Interpretation of p-values, coxph
Hi guys,
I have been testing the hypothesis for difference of survival between four different classes. The p-values provided in coxph output are confusing for me to interpret.
Here is the output :
sur<-coxph(Surv(SURVIV, status == 1)~factor(A)+cluster(rownames(d)), data = d, model=TRUE)
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(SURVIV, status == 1) ~ factor(A) + cluster(rownames(d)), data = d, model = TRUE)
2017 Dec 20
0
outlining (highlighting) pixels in ggplot2
Hi Eric,
you can use an annotate-layer, eg
ind<-which(sig>0,arr.ind = T)
ggplot(m1.melted, aes(x = Month, y = Site, fill = Concentration), autoscale
= FALSE, zmin = -1 * zmax1, zmax = zmax1) +
geom_tile() +
coord_equal() +
scale_fill_gradient2(low = "darkred",
mid = "white",
high = "darkblue",
2006 Jul 15
0
How to Interpret Results of Regression in R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Howdy, Gurus
I am appying R package for regression analysis as followings.
A dependent variable is jhnet that means ratio of dividing internal trip
with all trips in a traffic zone. There are many indepentent variables
including factor or dummy varibles such as parkfee, ohouse, Devt2,
corridor1.
2008 Jun 19
1
PrettyR (describe)
#is there a way to get NA in the table of descriptive statistics instead of
the function stopping Thank you in advance
#data
x.f <- structure(list(Site = structure(c(9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L,
9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L,
9L, 9L, 9L, 9L), .Label = c("BC", "HC", "RM119", "RM148", "RM179",
"RM185",
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When