search for: 0.003857

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I think that is what Andrew is trying to tell you, the printer needs to > support SASL over TLS/SSL or it will never work. I don't think there is > anything you can do, but I am surprised that the print doesn't already > support it, after all, it isn't something new ;-) Mi confusion grow. ;-) As stated in my

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Thanks! > > Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction > printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. > >

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

to my knowlidge, konica = xerox. and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now. i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s. i can check this monday. Greetz, Louis > Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: >> Mandi!

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do