Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "0.000163".
Did you mean:
0.000153
2023 Sep 23
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 206, Issue 5
Hello There,
I tried your advice and i don't think it works either,
See the logs,
"
/tmp/nut# ./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x
vendorid=... -x productid=... -x subdriver=...
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.52 (2.8.0-2557-g81fca30b2)
USB communication driver (libusb 1.0) 0.46
?? 0.000000??? [D3] main_arg: var='port' val='auto'
??
2023 Sep 23
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 206, Issue 5
<facepalm ;)> the ellispis "something=..." were supposed to be replaced by
your device ID numbers, etc.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023, 18:26 FatGear <fatgear1 at free.fr> wrote:
> Hello There,
>
> I tried your advice and i don't think it works either,
>
> See the logs,
>
> "
>
> /tmp/nut# ./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x
2019 Sep 23
0
warnung: base variable (battery.runtime.low) is immutable
Hi,
I am using the NUT Software 2.7.4 (Ubuntu Repository) on Ubuntu 18.04.
Configuring a UPS with the snmp-ups driver and overriding the
battery.runtime.low variable leads to following warnung/error:
Sep 23 11:10:08 hostname snmp-ups[27115]: dstate_setflags: base variable
(battery.runtime.low) is immutable
Default for battery.runtime.low is 180 seconds. My idea is to increase
the value to
2023 Sep 19
1
Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 206, Issue 5
Well, now that the `subdriver` option got added to `usbhid-ups` too, you
can at least try that (by building again the current master). See
command-line help for the subdrivers it would currently recognize, and copy
e.g. the first word as the matching option, e.g.:
./drivers/usbhid-ups -DDDDDD -d1 -s test -x port=auto -x vendorid=...
-x productid=... -x subdriver=...
and try to lockpick your
2023 Jun 13
3
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
After launching the command several times, with debug (posted by new code
in a new branch for the investigation) confirming that the same daemon
handles operations from the new client instances, its strace now has
numerous FDs to report after select() - so I guess it is a problem of
detecting an exit of the counterpart.
0.000000 [D2] parse_at: is 'heartbeat at localhost' in AT
2023 Jun 13
3
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
After launching the command several times, with debug (posted by new code
in a new branch for the investigation) confirming that the same daemon
handles operations from the new client instances, its strace now has
numerous FDs to report after select() - so I guess it is a problem of
detecting an exit of the counterpart.
0.000000 [D2] parse_at: is 'heartbeat at localhost' in AT
2018 Mar 13
2
Samba, AD and devices compatibility...
I'm trying to test/move some of my LDAP-enabled devices from my actual
OpenLDAP server(s) to my new samba AD domain.
For now, i'm poking with printers, and i'm testing a Konica-Minolta
BizHub C224e.
Defining user autentication to external source, i can set (between
LDAP, NTLM, NDS, ...) 'Active Directory', and i can/must provide the
domain naime.
After that, DNS and kerberos
2023 Jun 13
1
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
Hi,
Great work Jim! I?m glad you could reproduce the problem and found a potential culprit.
Just for my own interest I restored upsshed from my backups (version 2.7.4-13) and it seems to running ok, so no big runtime changes regarding that with Debian 12. It is not hogging CPU. From the daemon log the heartbeat seems to be working ok. Only difference between the old logs (pre Debian 12 update)
2023 Jun 13
1
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
Hi,
Great work Jim! I?m glad you could reproduce the problem and found a potential culprit.
Just for my own interest I restored upsshed from my backups (version 2.7.4-13) and it seems to running ok, so no big runtime changes regarding that with Debian 12. It is not hogging CPU. From the daemon log the heartbeat seems to be working ok. Only difference between the old logs (pre Debian 12 update)
2023 Jun 13
0
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
So... determining that FD is to be reaped proved hard. Internet lore
suggests fcntl() and poll() on the FD, but it just seems valid to them. The
errno is also usually not raised (once I saw a "111: Connection refused"
though).
So the best dumb idea so far is to bail out if we spent the whole loop (128
attempts) and only got zero-sized read replies and no errors.
2023 Jun 13
0
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
So... determining that FD is to be reaped proved hard. Internet lore
suggests fcntl() and poll() on the FD, but it just seems valid to them. The
errno is also usually not raised (once I saw a "111: Connection refused"
though).
So the best dumb idea so far is to bail out if we spent the whole loop (128
attempts) and only got zero-sized read replies and no errors.
2023 Jun 13
1
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
So, got some good news: I hear(*) I managed to reproduce the problem with
current NUT master and an adapted copy of your posted configs and script :D
Experimental debugging now sounds possible.
(*) PC under the desk wails with all its cooling fans as soon as I started
the client which spawned a daemon and itself had exited:
$ UPSNAME=heartbeat at localhost NOTIFYTYPE=ONBATT
2023 Jun 13
1
Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12
So, got some good news: I hear(*) I managed to reproduce the problem with
current NUT master and an adapted copy of your posted configs and script :D
Experimental debugging now sounds possible.
(*) PC under the desk wails with all its cooling fans as soon as I started
the client which spawned a daemon and itself had exited:
$ UPSNAME=heartbeat at localhost NOTIFYTYPE=ONBATT
2010 Nov 08
89
Re: DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 on 2.6.37-rc* ?
On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
> > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when
> > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be
> >