search for: 0.000054

Hello. I tested dovecot's work with expunge messages on Mdbox over strace (see at tail of message). As I can see dovecot process opens old storage m.* file, reads it content, opens new temporary file, writes in this one content and rename this new one to m.(*+1). How fast this algorithm works on system with about 10000 users and 5Tb data? I will use mdbox_rotate_interval for delayed expunge

On 18/09/17 17:23, Ben Turner wrote: > Do you want tuned or untuned? If tuned I'd like to try one of my tunings for metadata, but I will use yours if you want. (Re-CC'd list) I would be interested in both, if possible: To confirm that it's not only my machines that exhibit this behaviour given my settings, and to see what can be achieved with your tuned settings. Thank you!

After launching the command several times, with debug (posted by new code in a new branch for the investigation) confirming that the same daemon handles operations from the new client instances, its strace now has numerous FDs to report after select() - so I guess it is a problem of detecting an exit of the counterpart. 0.000000 [D2] parse_at: is 'heartbeat at localhost' in AT

After launching the command several times, with debug (posted by new code in a new branch for the investigation) confirming that the same daemon handles operations from the new client instances, its strace now has numerous FDs to report after select() - so I guess it is a problem of detecting an exit of the counterpart. 0.000000 [D2] parse_at: is 'heartbeat at localhost' in AT

Hi, Great work Jim! I?m glad you could reproduce the problem and found a potential culprit. Just for my own interest I restored upsshed from my backups (version 2.7.4-13) and it seems to running ok, so no big runtime changes regarding that with Debian 12. It is not hogging CPU. From the daemon log the heartbeat seems to be working ok. Only difference between the old logs (pre Debian 12 update)

Hi, Great work Jim! I?m glad you could reproduce the problem and found a potential culprit. Just for my own interest I restored upsshed from my backups (version 2.7.4-13) and it seems to running ok, so no big runtime changes regarding that with Debian 12. It is not hogging CPU. From the daemon log the heartbeat seems to be working ok. Only difference between the old logs (pre Debian 12 update)

Hi! I'm currently hunting a strange problem and looking for help! I have a samba3 fileserver (currently samba-3.0.20b, but problem can be reproduced with samba-3.0.7, but _not_ with samba2 like 2.2.8a), and I see performance problems when writing files with MS word 2002 SP3 from a NT4.0 (SP6a) workstation. Saving even the smallest file takes more than 10 seconds! Copying files with Windows

So... determining that FD is to be reaped proved hard. Internet lore suggests fcntl() and poll() on the FD, but it just seems valid to them. The errno is also usually not raised (once I saw a "111: Connection refused" though). So the best dumb idea so far is to bail out if we spent the whole loop (128 attempts) and only got zero-sized read replies and no errors.

So... determining that FD is to be reaped proved hard. Internet lore suggests fcntl() and poll() on the FD, but it just seems valid to them. The errno is also usually not raised (once I saw a "111: Connection refused" though). So the best dumb idea so far is to bail out if we spent the whole loop (128 attempts) and only got zero-sized read replies and no errors.

So, got some good news: I hear(*) I managed to reproduce the problem with current NUT master and an adapted copy of your posted configs and script :D Experimental debugging now sounds possible. (*) PC under the desk wails with all its cooling fans as soon as I started the client which spawned a daemon and itself had exited: $ UPSNAME=heartbeat at localhost NOTIFYTYPE=ONBATT

So, got some good news: I hear(*) I managed to reproduce the problem with current NUT master and an adapted copy of your posted configs and script :D Experimental debugging now sounds possible. (*) PC under the desk wails with all its cooling fans as soon as I started the client which spawned a daemon and itself had exited: $ UPSNAME=heartbeat at localhost NOTIFYTYPE=ONBATT

Are these the current functional procedures for dropping a dom0 on a jaunty 64 bit server? xen-tools: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/attempt-of-prevu-xen-3-4-1-hypervisor-on-ubuntu-jaunty-server-64-bit/ kernel: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/building-xenified-2-6-30-1-kernel-via-xen-patches-2-6-30-2-tar-bz2/ Regarding the patches used in the above procedure from here:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109681 Bug ID: 109681 Summary: Nvidia GT710 => nouveau + wayland + swayWM => crash when use acceleration (open Firefox) Product: Mesa Version: 18.3 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical