Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "0.000015".
Did you mean:
0.000010
2010 Dec 16
2
[BUG?] There is a possibility that 'i_ino' overflows
Hi,
In btrfs, inode number is increased each time a new file or directory
is made.
Therefore, if the making deletion of the file is repeated, value of
''i_ino'' increases rapidly.
For example, inode number changes as follows.
$ touch foo
$ ls -i foo
266 foo
$ rm foo
$ touch bar
$ ls -i bar
267 bar
$
And then, length of ''i_ino'' and
2016 Oct 13
3
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least
version 3.5:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870
However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian
Jessie.
On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6
disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6
connect fails immediately before the v4
2018 Jan 31
2
swiotlb buffer is full
Hello,
I've noticed firefox got randomly stuck, and as sometimes that leads to a
complete system lock-up, I've checked dmesg and got this:
[Jan29 10:49] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes)
[ +0.000033] swiotlb: coherent allocation failed for device 0000:01:00.0 size=2097152
[ +0.000004] CPU: 6 PID: 1023 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8 #1
[ +0.000003]
2016 Oct 14
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hai,
Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 )
Can you check that.
I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4.
As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5
I think you have forgotten something.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman
> via samba
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hi,
So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
NTSTATUS status;
status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
NULL, /* local_addr */
state->servers[i],
&state->cldap[i]);
if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) {
return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
2018 Feb 01
1
swiotlb buffer is full
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Yeah, a lot of people were getting that, as a result of some drm/ttm
> hugepage usage.
>
> Christian, did a fix ever end up going out? If so, what kernel was it
> included in?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/106
Alex
>
> -ilia
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Nabinger
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the
> issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c:
>
> for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) {
> NTSTATUS status;
>
> status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap,
> NULL, /* local_addr */
2018 Feb 01
0
swiotlb buffer is full
Yeah, a lot of people were getting that, as a result of some drm/ttm
hugepage usage.
Christian, did a fix ever end up going out? If so, what kernel was it
included in?
-ilia
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
<rnsanchez at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed firefox got randomly stuck, and as sometimes that leads to a
> complete system
2018 Mar 22
2
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp service:
From exim debug:
using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp
LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready
2001 Apr 04
1
F tests for glms with binomial error
Hi, can anyone help with this:
I am trying to analyse some data in the form of proportions with the glm
function in R and S-plus. When comparing different models with an F test,
I get different results from R and S-plus. Here's an example (there are
two factors and an interaction in the full model
"glm1<-glm(resp~time*set,family=binomial"):
In R, entering
2015 Jun 21
3
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using all my CPU.
This is from dovecot 2.2.13, I've just upgraded to 2.2.18
strace -r -p 17956 output:
Process 17956 attached
0.000000 lseek(19, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
0.000057 getsockname(19, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, NULL}, [2]) = 0
0.000043 epoll_ctl(15, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 19, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP,
2011 Nov 12
5
[Bug 1950] New: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950
Bug #: 1950
Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several
seconds
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.9p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
2015 Jun 21
0
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
What do you see in the logs?
My guess is that someone is trying a brute force auth against you,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Edward
> Betts
> Sent: domingo, 21 de Junho de 2015 10:42
> To: dovecot at dovecot.org
> Subject: dovecot auth using 100% CPU
>
> Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using
2018 Dec 12
1
vfs_fruit causes delay in listing directories for Windows clients
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:37:43PM +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote:
>>My goal with activating vfs_fruit was to speed up directory listings
>>for Mac clients, which works. Can the accompanying slowdown for
>>Windows clients be avoided?
>
>yeah, I guess so, but somebody has to dig through the
2018 Mar 23
0
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp
> service:
>
> From exim debug:
>
> using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp
> LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready
> LMTP>> LHLO mbox8...
> LMTP<< 250-mbox8
> LMTP<< 250-STARTTLS
> LMTP<< 250-8BITMIME
>
2013 Mar 05
1
Maildir or Mdbox and expunge messages.
Hello.
I tested dovecot's work with expunge messages on Mdbox over strace (see
at tail of message). As I can see dovecot process opens old storage m.*
file, reads it content, opens new temporary file, writes in this one
content and rename this new one to m.(*+1).
How fast this algorithm works on system with about 10000 users and 5Tb
data? I will use mdbox_rotate_interval for delayed expunge
2018 Mar 23
2
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
On 23.03.2018 10:04, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
>> I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp
>> service:
>>
>> From exim debug:
>>
>> using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp
>> LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready
>> LMTP>> LHLO mbox8...
>> LMTP<<
2007 Dec 12
3
ntpd
I am running a server inside of VMWare, and the clock gains ~30 seconds
every 1000 seconds or 1.03X.
I need to keep the drift under the magic 1000 limit that ntpd kills its
self, but despite setting maxpoll really low I get:
Dec 11 23:58:14 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 41
Dec 11 23:59:17 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 1
Dec 11 23:59:17 host
2015 Feb 12
4
Why the command 'service ntpd stop' cause the time reversed?
A shell script is deployed to synchronize time, the script is invoked hourly by crontab, and its content is as follows:
#!/bin/bash
service ntpd stop
ntpdate 192.168.0.191 #it's a valid ntpd server in LAN
service ntpd start
chkconfig ntpd on
Inspected the Linux log(Centos6.4 /var/log/messages), found the following fragment:
Jan 7 14:00:01 host1 ntpd[32101]: ntpd exiting on signal 15
Jan 7
2015 Apr 16
4
Samba 4 slow write
Dear Samba users,
here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd
2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy),
which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine, I've put
Ubuntu).
So, as I wrote, the smb.conf and LDAP database was copied from
the backup from the old system - but it works as well. Only one
thing what's very annoying. The Samba is