search for: 0.000015

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "0.000015".

Did you mean: 0.000010
2010 Dec 16
2
[BUG?] There is a possibility that 'i_ino' overflows
Hi, In btrfs, inode number is increased each time a new file or directory is made. Therefore, if the making deletion of the file is repeated, value of ''i_ino'' increases rapidly. For example, inode number changes as follows. $ touch foo $ ls -i foo 266 foo $ rm foo $ touch bar $ ls -i bar 267 bar $ And then, length of ''i_ino'' and
2016 Oct 13
3
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
According to this bugzilla entry, bug 6870 has been fixed as of at least version 3.5: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6870 However, I assert that it is present in 4.2.10, which ships with Debian Jessie. On my home network (IPv4 and IPv6), a box with Samba 4.2.10 with IPv6 disabled (via sysctl), will fail to contact a DC because the IPv6 connect fails immediately before the v4
2018 Jan 31
2
swiotlb buffer is full
Hello, I've noticed firefox got randomly stuck, and as sometimes that leads to a complete system lock-up, I've checked dmesg and got this: [Jan29 10:49] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 2097152 bytes) [ +0.000033] swiotlb: coherent allocation failed for device 0000:01:00.0 size=2097152 [ +0.000004] CPU: 6 PID: 1023 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8 #1 [ +0.000003]
2016 Oct 14
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hai, Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 ) Can you check that. I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4. As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5 I think you have forgotten something. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman > via samba
2016 Oct 17
2
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
Hi, So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { NTSTATUS status; status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, NULL, /* local_addr */ state->servers[i], &state->cldap[i]); if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) { return tevent_req_post(req, ev);
2018 Feb 01
1
swiotlb buffer is full
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Yeah, a lot of people were getting that, as a result of some drm/ttm > hugepage usage. > > Christian, did a fix ever end up going out? If so, what kernel was it > included in? https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/16/106 Alex > > -ilia > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Nabinger
2016 Oct 17
0
Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: > > for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { > NTSTATUS status; > > status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, > NULL, /* local_addr */
2018 Feb 01
0
swiotlb buffer is full
Yeah, a lot of people were getting that, as a result of some drm/ttm hugepage usage. Christian, did a fix ever end up going out? If so, what kernel was it included in? -ilia On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've noticed firefox got randomly stuck, and as sometimes that leads to a > complete system
2018 Mar 22
2
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp service: From exim debug: using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready
2001 Apr 04
1
F tests for glms with binomial error
Hi, can anyone help with this: I am trying to analyse some data in the form of proportions with the glm function in R and S-plus. When comparing different models with an F test, I get different results from R and S-plus. Here's an example (there are two factors and an interaction in the full model "glm1<-glm(resp~time*set,family=binomial"): In R, entering
2015 Jun 21
3
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using all my CPU. This is from dovecot 2.2.13, I've just upgraded to 2.2.18 strace -r -p 17956 output: Process 17956 attached 0.000000 lseek(19, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) 0.000057 getsockname(19, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, NULL}, [2]) = 0 0.000043 epoll_ctl(15, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 19, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP,
2011 Nov 12
5
[Bug 1950] New: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950 Bug #: 1950 Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2
2015 Jun 21
0
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
What do you see in the logs? My guess is that someone is trying a brute force auth against you, > -----Original Message----- > From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Edward > Betts > Sent: domingo, 21 de Junho de 2015 10:42 > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: dovecot auth using 100% CPU > > Every few days I find that dovecot auth is using
2018 Dec 12
1
vfs_fruit causes delay in listing directories for Windows clients
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:37:43PM +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >>My goal with activating vfs_fruit was to speed up directory listings >>for Mac clients, which works. Can the accompanying slowdown for >>Windows clients be avoided? > >yeah, I guess so, but somebody has to dig through the
2018 Mar 23
0
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp > service: > > From exim debug: > > using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp > LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready > LMTP>> LHLO mbox8... > LMTP<< 250-mbox8 > LMTP<< 250-STARTTLS > LMTP<< 250-8BITMIME >
2013 Mar 05
1
Maildir or Mdbox and expunge messages.
Hello. I tested dovecot's work with expunge messages on Mdbox over strace (see at tail of message). As I can see dovecot process opens old storage m.* file, reads it content, opens new temporary file, writes in this one content and rename this new one to m.(*+1). How fast this algorithm works on system with about 10000 users and 5Tb data? I will use mdbox_rotate_interval for delayed expunge
2018 Mar 23
2
lmtp service timeouting even after receiving full message
On 23.03.2018 10:04, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 22 of March 2018, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: >> I have a problem with some messages passed from exim to dovecot lmtp >> service: >> >> From exim debug: >> >> using socket /var/run/dovecot/lmtp >> LMTP<< 220 mbox8 ready >> LMTP>> LHLO mbox8... >> LMTP<<
2007 Dec 12
3
ntpd
I am running a server inside of VMWare, and the clock gains ~30 seconds every 1000 seconds or 1.03X. I need to keep the drift under the magic 1000 limit that ntpd kills its self, but despite setting maxpoll really low I get: Dec 11 23:58:14 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 41 Dec 11 23:59:17 host ntpd[4909]: kernel time discipline status change 1 Dec 11 23:59:17 host
2015 Feb 12
4
Why the command 'service ntpd stop' cause the time reversed?
A shell script is deployed to synchronize time, the script is invoked hourly by crontab, and its content is as follows: #!/bin/bash service ntpd stop ntpdate 192.168.0.191 #it's a valid ntpd server in LAN service ntpd start chkconfig ntpd on Inspected the Linux log(Centos6.4 /var/log/messages), found the following fragment: Jan 7 14:00:01 host1 ntpd[32101]: ntpd exiting on signal 15 Jan 7
2015 Apr 16
4
Samba 4 slow write
Dear Samba users, here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy), which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine, I've put Ubuntu). So, as I wrote, the smb.conf and LDAP database was copied from the backup from the old system - but it works as well. Only one thing what's very annoying. The Samba is