samba - Sep 2025 - [Announce] Samba 4.23.0rc3 Available for Download

Hello mjt,

Im sad to hear this. In my research I havent found any alternative for 
ubuntu except the linux-schools project which does not seem to be a good 
alternative.

Thank you for your packages and your time dedicated to packaging!

Quick sidenote: 4.22.4 seems to be missing from bookworm-bpo & trixie? 
Its in forky though...

Thanks and have a nice day, Matthias.

Am 01.09.25 um 10:03 schrieb Michael Tokarev via samba:
> On 29.08.2025 15:26, Jule Anger via samba wrote:
>> Release Announcements
>> ====================>>
>> This is the third release candidate release of Samba 4.23.? This is 
>> *not*
>> intended for production environments and is designed for testing
>> purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
>> system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/.
>>
>> Samba 4.23 will be the next version of the Samba suite.
> ..
>
> FWIW, I've built 4.23.0-rc3 (and rc2 too, actually) for supported
> versions of debian (bookworm, trixie) and ubuntu (jammy, noble),
> and made them available on my usual samba repository at
> http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ .
>
> At the same time, I dropped bullseye from there, - which simplified
> things quite significantly.
>
> Looking at the usage stats for my repository, I conclude it served
> its purpose quite well - to provide actual samba packages for popular
> debian-based distros when distribution-provided samba packages were
> lacking.
>
> These days, for debian, I'd say it is better to use debian-provided
> samba packages, because it has up to date samba (I keep it updated all
> the time) and because debian-backports is supposed to stay.
>
> For ubuntu, I don't know if it has anything comparable to the debian
> backports, - maybe some PPA, I dunno.? And for ubuntu, things are a
> bit more complex now: I made sure the delta between ubuntu and debian
> samba (and not only samba, actually) packages is minimal, and offered
> to incorporate ubuntu changes to debian packages, for benefits for
> both worlds.? However, ubuntu maintainers keep making changes in their
> versions without not only pushing them back, not only without any
> discussion about the planned changes (which are sometimes significant),
> but even without any minimal notice after it's already done.? This
> complete lack of cooperation makes my packages for ubuntu less usable,
> and makes me a bit sad, as my efforts goes nowhere.
>
> For this reason, I'll stop providing packages for ubuntu.
>
> So overall, my repository will be put down slowly, most likely during
> the end of 2025.
>
> And thank you all for the support!
>
> /mjt
>
-- 
Senior Webentwickler
Datenschutzbeauftragter

Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft
Friedrich-List-Str. 4
01445 Radebeul

Telefon: +49 (0) 351 83933-61
Web: www.ellerhold.de
Facebook: www.facebook.com/ellerhold.gruppe
Instagram: www.instagram.com/ellerhold.gruppe
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/ellerhold-gruppe

Amtsgericht Dresden / HRB 23769
Vorstand: Stephan Ellerhold, Maximilian Ellerhold
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Frank Ellerhold



---
Diese E-Mail und Ihre Anlagen enthalten vertrauliche Mitteilungen. Sollten Sie
nicht der beabsichtigte Adressat sein, so bitten wir Sie um Mitteilung und um
sofortiges l?schen dieser E-Mail und der Anlagen.

Unsere Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier:
https://www.ellerhold.de/datenschutz/

This e-mail and its attachments are privileged and confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify us and immediately delete this e-mail and
its attachments.

You can find our privacy policy here: https://www.ellerhold.de/datenschutz/

On 01.09.2025 11:41, Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via 
samba wrote:
> Quick sidenote: 4.22.4 seems to be missing from bookworm-bpo & trixie?
> Its in forky though...
Bookworm is now oldstable. Its backports is basically closed, but even
open, bpo12 uploads should have version which is less than the one in
trixie.  And trixie - stable - works in form of point releases.  A next
point release of trixie (13.1) is planned for Sep-06, samba 4.22.4
supposed to be there (I prepared and uploaded it, and it's been
accepted).  Once it's released in trixie, a backport to bookworm is
possible - but only if there's "enough reasons" for it.  For
oldstable-
backports, there should be actual reasons.

Debian stable and oldstable has their own rules, which are rather simple
and logical.

4.22.4 is available in my repository for all supported debian and ubuntu
versions.

Ubuntu is free to make the situation better, - there's not much needed,
at least the changed made in ubuntu would help already, so I know how
their packages interact with mine.  So far they don't want to have any
co-operation whatsoever.  It's their choice, not mine.

Thanks,

/mjt