On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 09:51 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba
wrote:>
> On 01/08/2023 09:46, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 09:36 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > >
> > > On 01/08/2023 09:26, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:09 -0300, Anderson Sampaio Mello
via samba
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi samba team.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release notes for version 4.19 state that samba
will support functional
> > > > > level 2016.
> > > >
> > > > Support is to perhaps overstate it, but we can claim to be
2016. We
> > > > haven't finished all the parts.
> > > >
> > > > > My question is whether it will also support Directory
Schema Version 88 or
> > > > > 87 or both?
> > > >
> > > > Schema 2019 is schema 88 and this is the default for Samba
4.19.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Bartlett
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew, I am struggling to understand this, if I go here:
> > >
> > >
https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=tree;f=source4/setup/ad-schema;h=beeca80c417b7a4eca8baf77274b7b77ea87fe9d;hb=refs/heads/v4-19-test
> > >
> > > Which I believe is what will become 4.19.0 when it is released.
> > >
> > > I cannot see there any mention of of 2019, the latest appears to
be
> > > 2016, which would be schema 87.
> >
> > The filename style changed, see the files tagged v1903:
> >
> > as referenced from python/samba/schema.py
> > "2019":
("AD_DS_Attributes_Windows_Server_v1903.ldf",
> > "AD_DS_Classes_Windows_Server_v1903.ldf",
> > 88),
> >
> > Andrew Bartlett
> >
>
> Ah, obvious, when you know :-)
>
> Wouldn't it be better to use something like:
>
> AD_DS_Attributes_Windows_Server_Schema_88.ldf ?
>
> Rowland
These are the filenames used
at?https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=23782
--
Andrew Bartlett (he/him) https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Team Member (since 2001) https://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba