Philippe LeCavalier
2023-Jul-13 16:45 UTC
[Samba] ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, 12:36 Adi Kriegisch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Hi! > > > I was looking at the code this morning trying to figure out how to > > reject packet with lvl2 properly, - unfortunately I don't know samba > > well enough to be able to find the place "quickly" and I got distracted > > by other things. It was my first thought when someone posted the debug > > info which mentioned invalid switch level, - I found the place where this > > happens but it is way down the line from the place where it should be > > rejected.. > I just tested the patch from Stefan Metzmacher[1] on top of Samba from > Debian/Bullseye (4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u5): the patch cleanly applied with > some fuzz and everything started working again! > We're still running an old NT4 domain with Debian domain controllers. > > all the best, > Adi > > [1] https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418#c25That's great news! Hopefully the binary for mainstream packages will be available just as quick.> >
Sonic
2023-Jul-13 19:13 UTC
[Samba] ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose False since windows 10/11 update 07/2023
The patch affects 2 files: ../source3/rpc_server/netlogon/srv_netlog_nt.c and ../source4/rpc_server/netlogon/dcerpc_netlogon.c Is the one in source3 for NT style domains and the one in source4 for AD style domains? I have an older 4.10 install using AD style and the patch for the source3 does not install, and I'm wondering if I just need to patch the file in the source4 tree. Thanks!