Op 30-03-2023 om 09:22 schreef Rowland Penny via samba:>
>
> On 30/03/2023 04:28, Gary Dale via samba wrote:
>
>>
>> Baokports are for people who need something that the stable version
>> doesn't provide. That's not me. I run Debian/Stable on my
servers for
>> a reason. I run Testing on my workstation because I want to help test
>> things. And I run it my new laptop because it requires drivers that
>> aren't available in Stable.
>>
>> Debian does update stable when a serious issue is found that can't
be
>> patched. However that is a vector for breakage - it wasn't that
long
>> ago that an update to ghostscript broke a lot programs in Stable that
>> used it to produce PDFs. We had to choose between a security flaw or
>> a lack of functionality.
>>
>> I'll wait until Bookworm becomes Stable to get the Samba upgrade.
>
> Samba is a rapidly evolving thing, blink and you miss something, in my
> opinion you need to keep up to date.
>
> Debian does, like most distros, backport Samba patches, but it doesn't
> backport everything. There was a large change at Samba 4.16.0, the
> entire Heimdal was replaced with a very newer version and if you have
> any Windows 11 or up to date Windows 10 machines, you are going to
> need it. I do not think that Debian has backported that change to the
> 4.13.x series it provides in the standard Debian 11 repo, but it is in
> the 4.17.6 version from backports (which, as far as I understand, is
> exactly the same version that Debian 12 will supply)
>
> It is your computer and you get to decide what you run on it, but when
> the Debian Samba maintainer and a member of the Samba team are both
> advising using backports, then you may want to wonder why.
>
> Rowland
>
>
To add to this, if you do not want everything from backports then use
apt-pinning so that you just get the Samba packages from there.
Indeed Samba evolves much faster than Debian releases are released, so
sticking to the primary release is not a good thing in this particular case.
- Kees.