samba - Feb 2023 - long delays with file enumeration & listing in large data storage environment

On 08/02/2023 12:48, Luke Barone via samba wrote:
> hide unreadable = yes
> 
> I was under the impression this was a very time consuming option in
> domains.
> 
>
Just making myself an opticians appointment, how did I miss that ?
Probably fixated on the bad sanitisation.

Rowland

On 2/8/23 14:24, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On 08/02/2023 12:48, Luke Barone via samba wrote:
>> hide unreadable = yes
>>
>> I was under the impression this was a very time consuming option in
>> domains.
> 
> Just making myself an opticians appointment, how did I miss that ?
> Probably fixated on the bad sanitisation.
:) You could add this to your Samba collect debug info script: if you 
detect this option bail out! :)))

-slow

-- 
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team                 https://samba.org/
SerNet Samba Team Lead      https://sernet.de/en/team-samba

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20230208/daf99a63/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

Hi Rowland, Ralph,

The sanitation in my original post was more me masking confidential details
(domains, hosts, ups, workgroups, etc) quickly. The unsanitized running
smb.conf on the test servers do not have the same
errors/duplications/missing details as my quick cover up job does in the
mail chain. Forgive me for that confusion :)

I am, however, in process of testing a bunch of additional stuff that you
guys have recommended as we speak, along with recommendations from the
other replies. Especially paying close attention to inappropriate options
in the conf

Additionally I am rebuilding one test server with RHEL 9.0 to have a kernel
higher than 5.6 (RHEL 9.0 is 5.14 OOB) and has samba 4.17 samba packages
out the gate

Will update soon on outcome. Our Windows engineer is also building out a
beefier DC to test against as well.

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 8:25 AM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at
lists.samba.org>
wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/2023 12:48, Luke Barone via samba wrote:
> > hide unreadable = yes
> >
> > I was under the impression this was a very time consuming option in
> > domains.
> >
> >
>
> Just making myself an opticians appointment, how did I miss that ?
> Probably fixated on the bad sanitisation.
>
> Rowland
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>